We are having some trouble using the Pearson 4 implementation of the functions pearsrnd, pearspdf and pearscdf.
We think that pearsrnd does not generate samples from the distribution defined in pearspdf. In particular, we’ve found that pearsrnd over generates observations in the tails of the distribution.
In order to see this, we’ve implemented two simple tests:
1. We’ve compared the PDF of the Pearson 4 distribution (using pearspdf) to the PDF obtained from a simulation using pearsrnd, but we’ve found that the two are very different (even with a very long sample). This problem doesn’t happen for other distributions. In particular, we’ve implemented the same test with the Pearson 6, and the results are satisfactory.
2. In addition, to test if the generatated sample is compatible with its CDF, we’ve applied the function pearscdf to the generated sample. We should have got a uniform distribution, because if X is a random variable and F its CDF, then F(X) is uniform in [0,1]. This is indeed what we’ve got with the Pearson 6, as expected, but not what we’ve got using the Pearson 4.
We’ve conducted a similar experiment using Mathematica, and we get the correct result.
We’ve attached the code we’ve used.
Any idea why we’re getting this result?
Thank you very much.
%% Seed
rng(123)

%% Parameters
%Type IV
mu4 = 5;
sigma4 = 1;
skew4 = 1;
kurt4 = 10;

% Check the distribution type
[ign, type4] = pearsrnd(mu4, sigma4, skew4, kurt4, 1);
disp("This Pearson is of type " + type4)

% Type VI
mu6 = 2;
sigma6 = 1;
skew6 = 2;
kurt6 = 10;

% Check the distribution type
[ign, type6] = pearsrnd(mu6, sigma6, skew6, kurt6, 1);
disp("This Pearson is of type " + type6)

%% Simulate n observations according to both Pearson distributions defined above
n = 100000;

samples4 = pearsrnd(mu4, sigma4, skew4, kurt4, 1, n);
samples6 = pearsrnd(mu6, sigma6, skew6, kurt6, 1, n);

%% First test: we compare the simulated pdf (i.e. histogram of the sample) to the closed form PDF
pdf4 = @(x) pearspdf(x, mu4, sigma4, skew4, kurt4);
pdf6 = @(x) pearspdf(x, mu6, sigma6, skew6, kurt6);
x_ = linspace(-10, 10, 10000);
y4 = pdf4(x_);
y6 = pdf6(x_);

figure(‘Position’, [100, 100, 1000, 400]); % [left, bottom, width, height]

subplot(1, 2, 1);
plot(x_, y4, Color=’red’, LineWidth=2)
title(‘Simulated and closed form PDF for Pearson 4’)
hold on
histogram(samples4, 1000, ‘Normalization’, ‘pdf’, ‘FaceColor’, ‘blue’)
hold off

subplot(1, 2, 2);
plot(x_, y6, Color=’red’, LineWidth=2)
title(‘Simulated and closed form PDF for Pearson 6’)
hold on
histogram(samples6, 1000, ‘Normalization’, ‘pdf’, ‘FaceColor’, ‘blue’)
hold off

sgtitle(‘Test 1: Comparison between Pearson 4 and 6’);

%% Second test: Let X be a random variable and F its CDF, then F(X) is uniform in [0,1].
% We apply the Pearson CDF to the simulated observations and plot its
% histogram. We should obtain something resembling a uniform distribution.

figure(‘Position’, [100, 100, 1000, 400]); % [left, bottom, width, height]

subplot(1, 2, 1);
u4 = pearscdf(samples4, mu4, sigma4, skew4, kurt4);
histogram(u4)
title(‘F(X) for Pearson 4’)

subplot(1, 2, 2);
u6 = pearscdf(samples6, mu6, sigma6, skew6, kurt6);
histogram(u6)
title(‘F(X) for Pearson 6’)

sgtitle(‘Test 2: Comparison between Pearson 4 and 6’);

%% Conclusion
%We get the expected results using the Pearson 6, but we cannot say the
%same for the Pearson 4. Why?We are having some trouble using the Pearson 4 implementation of the functions pearsrnd, pearspdf and pearscdf.
We think that pearsrnd does not generate samples from the distribution defined in pearspdf. In particular, we’ve found that pearsrnd over generates observations in the tails of the distribution.
In order to see this, we’ve implemented two simple tests:
1. We’ve compared the PDF of the Pearson 4 distribution (using pearspdf) to the PDF obtained from a simulation using pearsrnd, but we’ve found that the two are very different (even with a very long sample). This problem doesn’t happen for other distributions. In particular, we’ve implemented the same test with the Pearson 6, and the results are satisfactory.
2. In addition, to test if the generatated sample is compatible with its CDF, we’ve applied the function pearscdf to the generated sample. We should have got a uniform distribution, because if X is a random variable and F its CDF, then F(X) is uniform in [0,1]. This is indeed what we’ve got with the Pearson 6, as expected, but not what we’ve got using the Pearson 4.
We’ve conducted a similar experiment using Mathematica, and we get the correct result.
We’ve attached the code we’ve used.
Any idea why we’re getting this result?
Thank you very much.
%% Seed
rng(123)

%% Parameters
%Type IV
mu4 = 5;
sigma4 = 1;
skew4 = 1;
kurt4 = 10;

% Check the distribution type
[ign, type4] = pearsrnd(mu4, sigma4, skew4, kurt4, 1);
disp("This Pearson is of type " + type4)

% Type VI
mu6 = 2;
sigma6 = 1;
skew6 = 2;
kurt6 = 10;

% Check the distribution type
[ign, type6] = pearsrnd(mu6, sigma6, skew6, kurt6, 1);
disp("This Pearson is of type " + type6)

%% Simulate n observations according to both Pearson distributions defined above
n = 100000;

samples4 = pearsrnd(mu4, sigma4, skew4, kurt4, 1, n);
samples6 = pearsrnd(mu6, sigma6, skew6, kurt6, 1, n);

%% First test: we compare the simulated pdf (i.e. histogram of the sample) to the closed form PDF
pdf4 = @(x) pearspdf(x, mu4, sigma4, skew4, kurt4);
pdf6 = @(x) pearspdf(x, mu6, sigma6, skew6, kurt6);
x_ = linspace(-10, 10, 10000);
y4 = pdf4(x_);
y6 = pdf6(x_);

figure(‘Position’, [100, 100, 1000, 400]); % [left, bottom, width, height]

subplot(1, 2, 1);
plot(x_, y4, Color=’red’, LineWidth=2)
title(‘Simulated and closed form PDF for Pearson 4’)
hold on
histogram(samples4, 1000, ‘Normalization’, ‘pdf’, ‘FaceColor’, ‘blue’)
hold off

subplot(1, 2, 2);
plot(x_, y6, Color=’red’, LineWidth=2)
title(‘Simulated and closed form PDF for Pearson 6’)
hold on
histogram(samples6, 1000, ‘Normalization’, ‘pdf’, ‘FaceColor’, ‘blue’)
hold off

sgtitle(‘Test 1: Comparison between Pearson 4 and 6’);

%% Second test: Let X be a random variable and F its CDF, then F(X) is uniform in [0,1].
% We apply the Pearson CDF to the simulated observations and plot its
% histogram. We should obtain something resembling a uniform distribution.

figure(‘Position’, [100, 100, 1000, 400]); % [left, bottom, width, height]

subplot(1, 2, 1);
u4 = pearscdf(samples4, mu4, sigma4, skew4, kurt4);
histogram(u4)
title(‘F(X) for Pearson 4’)

subplot(1, 2, 2);
u6 = pearscdf(samples6, mu6, sigma6, skew6, kurt6);
histogram(u6)
title(‘F(X) for Pearson 6’)

sgtitle(‘Test 2: Comparison between Pearson 4 and 6’);

%% Conclusion
%We get the expected results using the Pearson 6, but we cannot say the
%same for the Pearson 4. Why? We are having some trouble using the Pearson 4 implementation of the functions pearsrnd, pearspdf and pearscdf.
We think that pearsrnd does not generate samples from the distribution defined in pearspdf. In particular, we’ve found that pearsrnd over generates observations in the tails of the distribution.
In order to see this, we’ve implemented two simple tests:
1. We’ve compared the PDF of the Pearson 4 distribution (using pearspdf) to the PDF obtained from a simulation using pearsrnd, but we’ve found that the two are very different (even with a very long sample). This problem doesn’t happen for other distributions. In particular, we’ve implemented the same test with the Pearson 6, and the results are satisfactory.
2. In addition, to test if the generatated sample is compatible with its CDF, we’ve applied the function pearscdf to the generated sample. We should have got a uniform distribution, because if X is a random variable and F its CDF, then F(X) is uniform in [0,1]. This is indeed what we’ve got with the Pearson 6, as expected, but not what we’ve got using the Pearson 4.
We’ve conducted a similar experiment using Mathematica, and we get the correct result.
We’ve attached the code we’ve used.
Any idea why we’re getting this result?
Thank you very much.
%% Seed
rng(123)

%% Parameters
%Type IV
mu4 = 5;
sigma4 = 1;
skew4 = 1;
kurt4 = 10;

% Check the distribution type
[ign, type4] = pearsrnd(mu4, sigma4, skew4, kurt4, 1);
disp("This Pearson is of type " + type4)

% Type VI
mu6 = 2;
sigma6 = 1;
skew6 = 2;
kurt6 = 10;

% Check the distribution type
[ign, type6] = pearsrnd(mu6, sigma6, skew6, kurt6, 1);
disp("This Pearson is of type " + type6)

%% Simulate n observations according to both Pearson distributions defined above
n = 100000;

samples4 = pearsrnd(mu4, sigma4, skew4, kurt4, 1, n);
samples6 = pearsrnd(mu6, sigma6, skew6, kurt6, 1, n);

%% First test: we compare the simulated pdf (i.e. histogram of the sample) to the closed form PDF
pdf4 = @(x) pearspdf(x, mu4, sigma4, skew4, kurt4);
pdf6 = @(x) pearspdf(x, mu6, sigma6, skew6, kurt6);
x_ = linspace(-10, 10, 10000);
y4 = pdf4(x_);
y6 = pdf6(x_);

figure(‘Position’, [100, 100, 1000, 400]); % [left, bottom, width, height]

subplot(1, 2, 1);
plot(x_, y4, Color=’red’, LineWidth=2)
title(‘Simulated and closed form PDF for Pearson 4’)
hold on
histogram(samples4, 1000, ‘Normalization’, ‘pdf’, ‘FaceColor’, ‘blue’)
hold off

subplot(1, 2, 2);
plot(x_, y6, Color=’red’, LineWidth=2)
title(‘Simulated and closed form PDF for Pearson 6’)
hold on
histogram(samples6, 1000, ‘Normalization’, ‘pdf’, ‘FaceColor’, ‘blue’)
hold off

sgtitle(‘Test 1: Comparison between Pearson 4 and 6’);

%% Second test: Let X be a random variable and F its CDF, then F(X) is uniform in [0,1].
% We apply the Pearson CDF to the simulated observations and plot its
% histogram. We should obtain something resembling a uniform distribution.

figure(‘Position’, [100, 100, 1000, 400]); % [left, bottom, width, height]

subplot(1, 2, 1);
u4 = pearscdf(samples4, mu4, sigma4, skew4, kurt4);
histogram(u4)
title(‘F(X) for Pearson 4’)

subplot(1, 2, 2);
u6 = pearscdf(samples6, mu6, sigma6, skew6, kurt6);
histogram(u6)
title(‘F(X) for Pearson 6’)

sgtitle(‘Test 2: Comparison between Pearson 4 and 6’);

%% Conclusion
%We get the expected results using the Pearson 6, but we cannot say the
%same for the Pearson 4. Why? pearson, distribution, statistics, random number generator, type iv MATLAB Answers — New Questions

​

o2 = [0, 0, 0]; % Origin
ain = [1, 0, 0]; % Initial vector
input_axis = [0, 0, 1]; % Axis of rotation (z-axis)
theta = deg2rad(25); % Angle of rotation in radians
% Rotation matrix function
rot_matrix = @(axis, theta) cos(theta) * eye(3) + …
sin(theta) * [0, -axis(3), axis(2); axis(3), 0, -axis(1); -axis(2), axis(1), 0] + …
(1 – cos(theta)) * (axis’ * axis);
% Compute the rotated vector
a_rotated = rot_matrix(input_axis, theta) * (ain – o2)’ + o2′;
% Transpose to row vector for display
a_rotated = a_rotated’;
bin=[3,0,2];
o4=[3,0,-2];
output_axis=[1,0,0];
% Compute the rotated vector in terms of phi
syms phi;
rot_matrix_phi = rot_matrix(output_axis, phi);
bin_o4_rotated = rot_matrix_phi * (bin – o4)’ ;
bin_o4_rotated = bin_o4_rotated’; % Transpose to row vector for display
% Display the symbolic result
disp(‘Rotated bin-o4 in terms of phi:’);
% Display the result
disp(a_rotated)
disp(bin_o4_rotated);
o4o2=o4-o2;
disp(o4o2);
coupler=(o4o2+bin_o4_rotated-a_rotated);
display(coupler);
% Define the initial rotated components of the coupler
syms phi;
coupler = subs(coupler, conj(phi), phi);
%disp(‘Coupler vector without conjugate:’);
disp(coupler);
% Parametric substitution
syms t;
cos_phi = (1 – t^2) / (1 + t^2);
sin_phi = 2 * t / (1 + t^2);
% Substitute parametric forms into coupler components
coupler_parametric = subs(coupler, [cos(phi), sin(phi)], [cos_phi, sin_phi]);
% Display the parametric coupler
disp(‘Parametric form of coupler:’);
disp(coupler_parametric);

%after this stepit is unable to solve for theta more than 91 deg or less than -91 deg
syms targetvalue % it might be 3.5 …
normsq = expand(sum(coupler_parametric.^2) – targetvalue^2);
normpoly = simplify(normsq*(t^2+1)^2);
vpa(expand(normpoly),4);
tsolve = solve(normpoly,t,’maxdegree’,4,’returnconditions’,true);
h=vpa(subs(tsolve.t,targetvalue,3.5));
%disp(h);
real_solutions = h(imag(h) == 0);
disp(‘Real roots:’);
disp(real_solutions);
% Convert real values of t to angles using angle = 2 * atan(t)
angles_rad = 2 * atan(real_solutions);
angles_deg = rad2deg(angles_rad);
% Display angles in degrees
disp(‘Angles in degrees before adjustment:’);
disp(angles_deg);

%please consider that if i take theta(in bold) more than 91 deg or less than -91 deg instead of 25 then it is not giving me the output(means angles_deg),is it the problem with my code or rotation matrix?o2 = [0, 0, 0]; % Origin
ain = [1, 0, 0]; % Initial vector
input_axis = [0, 0, 1]; % Axis of rotation (z-axis)
theta = deg2rad(25); % Angle of rotation in radians
% Rotation matrix function
rot_matrix = @(axis, theta) cos(theta) * eye(3) + …
sin(theta) * [0, -axis(3), axis(2); axis(3), 0, -axis(1); -axis(2), axis(1), 0] + …
(1 – cos(theta)) * (axis’ * axis);
% Compute the rotated vector
a_rotated = rot_matrix(input_axis, theta) * (ain – o2)’ + o2′;
% Transpose to row vector for display
a_rotated = a_rotated’;
bin=[3,0,2];
o4=[3,0,-2];
output_axis=[1,0,0];
% Compute the rotated vector in terms of phi
syms phi;
rot_matrix_phi = rot_matrix(output_axis, phi);
bin_o4_rotated = rot_matrix_phi * (bin – o4)’ ;
bin_o4_rotated = bin_o4_rotated’; % Transpose to row vector for display
% Display the symbolic result
disp(‘Rotated bin-o4 in terms of phi:’);
% Display the result
disp(a_rotated)
disp(bin_o4_rotated);
o4o2=o4-o2;
disp(o4o2);
coupler=(o4o2+bin_o4_rotated-a_rotated);
display(coupler);
% Define the initial rotated components of the coupler
syms phi;
coupler = subs(coupler, conj(phi), phi);
%disp(‘Coupler vector without conjugate:’);
disp(coupler);
% Parametric substitution
syms t;
cos_phi = (1 – t^2) / (1 + t^2);
sin_phi = 2 * t / (1 + t^2);
% Substitute parametric forms into coupler components
coupler_parametric = subs(coupler, [cos(phi), sin(phi)], [cos_phi, sin_phi]);
% Display the parametric coupler
disp(‘Parametric form of coupler:’);
disp(coupler_parametric);

%after this stepit is unable to solve for theta more than 91 deg or less than -91 deg
syms targetvalue % it might be 3.5 …
normsq = expand(sum(coupler_parametric.^2) – targetvalue^2);
normpoly = simplify(normsq*(t^2+1)^2);
vpa(expand(normpoly),4);
tsolve = solve(normpoly,t,’maxdegree’,4,’returnconditions’,true);
h=vpa(subs(tsolve.t,targetvalue,3.5));
%disp(h);
real_solutions = h(imag(h) == 0);
disp(‘Real roots:’);
disp(real_solutions);
% Convert real values of t to angles using angle = 2 * atan(t)
angles_rad = 2 * atan(real_solutions);
angles_deg = rad2deg(angles_rad);
% Display angles in degrees
disp(‘Angles in degrees before adjustment:’);
disp(angles_deg);

%please consider that if i take theta(in bold) more than 91 deg or less than -91 deg instead of 25 then it is not giving me the output(means angles_deg),is it the problem with my code or rotation matrix? o2 = [0, 0, 0]; % Origin
ain = [1, 0, 0]; % Initial vector
input_axis = [0, 0, 1]; % Axis of rotation (z-axis)
theta = deg2rad(25); % Angle of rotation in radians
% Rotation matrix function
rot_matrix = @(axis, theta) cos(theta) * eye(3) + …
sin(theta) * [0, -axis(3), axis(2); axis(3), 0, -axis(1); -axis(2), axis(1), 0] + …
(1 – cos(theta)) * (axis’ * axis);
% Compute the rotated vector
a_rotated = rot_matrix(input_axis, theta) * (ain – o2)’ + o2′;
% Transpose to row vector for display
a_rotated = a_rotated’;
bin=[3,0,2];
o4=[3,0,-2];
output_axis=[1,0,0];
% Compute the rotated vector in terms of phi
syms phi;
rot_matrix_phi = rot_matrix(output_axis, phi);
bin_o4_rotated = rot_matrix_phi * (bin – o4)’ ;
bin_o4_rotated = bin_o4_rotated’; % Transpose to row vector for display
% Display the symbolic result
disp(‘Rotated bin-o4 in terms of phi:’);
% Display the result
disp(a_rotated)
disp(bin_o4_rotated);
o4o2=o4-o2;
disp(o4o2);
coupler=(o4o2+bin_o4_rotated-a_rotated);
display(coupler);
% Define the initial rotated components of the coupler
syms phi;
coupler = subs(coupler, conj(phi), phi);
%disp(‘Coupler vector without conjugate:’);
disp(coupler);
% Parametric substitution
syms t;
cos_phi = (1 – t^2) / (1 + t^2);
sin_phi = 2 * t / (1 + t^2);
% Substitute parametric forms into coupler components
coupler_parametric = subs(coupler, [cos(phi), sin(phi)], [cos_phi, sin_phi]);
% Display the parametric coupler
disp(‘Parametric form of coupler:’);
disp(coupler_parametric);

%after this stepit is unable to solve for theta more than 91 deg or less than -91 deg
syms targetvalue % it might be 3.5 …
normsq = expand(sum(coupler_parametric.^2) – targetvalue^2);
normpoly = simplify(normsq*(t^2+1)^2);
vpa(expand(normpoly),4);
tsolve = solve(normpoly,t,’maxdegree’,4,’returnconditions’,true);
h=vpa(subs(tsolve.t,targetvalue,3.5));
%disp(h);
real_solutions = h(imag(h) == 0);
disp(‘Real roots:’);
disp(real_solutions);
% Convert real values of t to angles using angle = 2 * atan(t)
angles_rad = 2 * atan(real_solutions);
angles_deg = rad2deg(angles_rad);
% Display angles in degrees
disp(‘Angles in degrees before adjustment:’);
disp(angles_deg);

%please consider that if i take theta(in bold) more than 91 deg or less than -91 deg instead of 25 then it is not giving me the output(means angles_deg),is it the problem with my code or rotation matrix? vector, rotation MATLAB Answers — New Questions

​

x = [0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90];

y = [0 0.0328 0.2521 0.7975 1.7295 3.0213 4.5714 6.2283 7.8191 9.1752];

plot(x,y,’LineWidth’,2);
hold on

yline(5, ‘r’);

xlim([0 90]);
ylim([0 9.1752]);x = [0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90];

y = [0 0.0328 0.2521 0.7975 1.7295 3.0213 4.5714 6.2283 7.8191 9.1752];

plot(x,y,’LineWidth’,2);
hold on

yline(5, ‘r’);

xlim([0 90]);
ylim([0 9.1752]); x = [0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90];

y = [0 0.0328 0.2521 0.7975 1.7295 3.0213 4.5714 6.2283 7.8191 9.1752];

plot(x,y,’LineWidth’,2);
hold on

yline(5, ‘r’);

xlim([0 90]);
ylim([0 9.1752]); matlab, plot, plotting MATLAB Answers — New Questions

​

Hi, I’ve been working on the mask r-cnn following the documentation instructions. I’ve got everything tot work but I stumbled upon a potential library mistake. Let me explain better my situation: I am working on a dataset with ~250 images (split between training and validation) and with just 1 category. Each image might have 40-50 instances up to 600-650 instances.
The problem is this, mask r-cnn can only detect up to 100 instances by class definition. I believe this is hurting the training of the network – however I cannot confirm this because I have to run the training by remote, by command prompt, since I don’t have a GPU powerful enough to run the training locally. My evidence is that the network, after the training, performs somewhat well on images with 40-50 instances, while it performs horrible on images with a lot of instances. In fact, when I evaluate my network on the validation set (something that I can do on my own computer), the network outputs at most 100 masks per image.
My "local" fix: I edited the maskrcnn.m file of the library. I went to the directory "C:ProgramFilesMATLABR2023btoolboxvisionvision@maskrcnnmaskrcnn.m" and at line 172 of the code, instead of
NumStrongestRegionsPrediction = 100
I put (expecting to not detect more than 800 instances, given my ground truth data)
NumStrongestRegionsPrediction = 800
which fixes my issue at least at validation time. However, since my training is run without this fix and, given my results, I am writing here to ask what I can do about this issue, I am basically certain my code is correct.
Again, all I can observe at training time is the training loss, which converges to a good number, however sometimes it outputs a bigger number, probably because it encounters the batch with the images with a lot of instances – in other words, the network isn’t learning enough out of these images and mistakes/training loss.
I can provide more information if needed, however for now I want to keep the post simple.Hi, I’ve been working on the mask r-cnn following the documentation instructions. I’ve got everything tot work but I stumbled upon a potential library mistake. Let me explain better my situation: I am working on a dataset with ~250 images (split between training and validation) and with just 1 category. Each image might have 40-50 instances up to 600-650 instances.
The problem is this, mask r-cnn can only detect up to 100 instances by class definition. I believe this is hurting the training of the network – however I cannot confirm this because I have to run the training by remote, by command prompt, since I don’t have a GPU powerful enough to run the training locally. My evidence is that the network, after the training, performs somewhat well on images with 40-50 instances, while it performs horrible on images with a lot of instances. In fact, when I evaluate my network on the validation set (something that I can do on my own computer), the network outputs at most 100 masks per image.
My "local" fix: I edited the maskrcnn.m file of the library. I went to the directory "C:ProgramFilesMATLABR2023btoolboxvisionvision@maskrcnnmaskrcnn.m" and at line 172 of the code, instead of
NumStrongestRegionsPrediction = 100
I put (expecting to not detect more than 800 instances, given my ground truth data)
NumStrongestRegionsPrediction = 800
which fixes my issue at least at validation time. However, since my training is run without this fix and, given my results, I am writing here to ask what I can do about this issue, I am basically certain my code is correct.
Again, all I can observe at training time is the training loss, which converges to a good number, however sometimes it outputs a bigger number, probably because it encounters the batch with the images with a lot of instances – in other words, the network isn’t learning enough out of these images and mistakes/training loss.
I can provide more information if needed, however for now I want to keep the post simple. Hi, I’ve been working on the mask r-cnn following the documentation instructions. I’ve got everything tot work but I stumbled upon a potential library mistake. Let me explain better my situation: I am working on a dataset with ~250 images (split between training and validation) and with just 1 category. Each image might have 40-50 instances up to 600-650 instances.
The problem is this, mask r-cnn can only detect up to 100 instances by class definition. I believe this is hurting the training of the network – however I cannot confirm this because I have to run the training by remote, by command prompt, since I don’t have a GPU powerful enough to run the training locally. My evidence is that the network, after the training, performs somewhat well on images with 40-50 instances, while it performs horrible on images with a lot of instances. In fact, when I evaluate my network on the validation set (something that I can do on my own computer), the network outputs at most 100 masks per image.
My "local" fix: I edited the maskrcnn.m file of the library. I went to the directory "C:ProgramFilesMATLABR2023btoolboxvisionvision@maskrcnnmaskrcnn.m" and at line 172 of the code, instead of
NumStrongestRegionsPrediction = 100
I put (expecting to not detect more than 800 instances, given my ground truth data)
NumStrongestRegionsPrediction = 800
which fixes my issue at least at validation time. However, since my training is run without this fix and, given my results, I am writing here to ask what I can do about this issue, I am basically certain my code is correct.
Again, all I can observe at training time is the training loss, which converges to a good number, however sometimes it outputs a bigger number, probably because it encounters the batch with the images with a lot of instances – in other words, the network isn’t learning enough out of these images and mistakes/training loss.
I can provide more information if needed, however for now I want to keep the post simple. deep learning, image segmentation, cnn MATLAB Answers — New Questions

​

Hello. I want to use my dataset as input to the SORT example ( https://www.mathworks.com/help/fusion/ug/implement-simple-online-and-realtime-tracking.html ) in Matlab. I used the yolo4 object detection algorithm and set the input for the SORT algorithm. I attached my input data to the SORT example, which is in objectDetection format as it should be. when I run the SORT algorithm with my dataset, this error happens:
error using ()
changing the data type on input 3 of the system object trackerGNN is not allowed without first calling the release(.) method.
Error in helperRunSort (line 18)
tracks = tracker(highScoreDetections, reader.CurrentTime, iouCost);

I would appreciate it if anyone could help me solve this issue. Regards
whos -file objectDetectionsCell.matHello. I want to use my dataset as input to the SORT example ( https://www.mathworks.com/help/fusion/ug/implement-simple-online-and-realtime-tracking.html ) in Matlab. I used the yolo4 object detection algorithm and set the input for the SORT algorithm. I attached my input data to the SORT example, which is in objectDetection format as it should be. when I run the SORT algorithm with my dataset, this error happens:
error using ()
changing the data type on input 3 of the system object trackerGNN is not allowed without first calling the release(.) method.
Error in helperRunSort (line 18)
tracks = tracker(highScoreDetections, reader.CurrentTime, iouCost);

I would appreciate it if anyone could help me solve this issue. Regards
whos -file objectDetectionsCell.mat Hello. I want to use my dataset as input to the SORT example ( https://www.mathworks.com/help/fusion/ug/implement-simple-online-and-realtime-tracking.html ) in Matlab. I used the yolo4 object detection algorithm and set the input for the SORT algorithm. I attached my input data to the SORT example, which is in objectDetection format as it should be. when I run the SORT algorithm with my dataset, this error happens:
error using ()
changing the data type on input 3 of the system object trackerGNN is not allowed without first calling the release(.) method.
Error in helperRunSort (line 18)
tracks = tracker(highScoreDetections, reader.CurrentTime, iouCost);

I would appreciate it if anyone could help me solve this issue. Regards
whos -file objectDetectionsCell.mat object tracking, sort, simple online ral time tracking, error in matlab example MATLAB Answers — New Questions

​

This is from the matalb documentation of reconfigurable intelligent surfaces. helperRISSurface is function or a structure ? how can i pass parameters?
i tried to rum this and i am getting error here. i have uploaded the screenshots
kindly help me

thank you.

=========================================================================
ris = helperRISSurface(‘Size’,[Nr Nc],’ElementSpacing’,[dr dc],…
‘ReflectorElement’,phased.IsotropicAntennaElement,’OperatingFrequency’,fc)
ris =
helperRISSurface with properties:

ReflectorElement: [1×1 phased.IsotropicAntennaElement]
Size: [10 20]
ElementSpacing: [0.0054 0.0054]
OperatingFrequency: 2.8000e+10
=====================================================================This is from the matalb documentation of reconfigurable intelligent surfaces. helperRISSurface is function or a structure ? how can i pass parameters?
i tried to rum this and i am getting error here. i have uploaded the screenshots
kindly help me

thank you.

=========================================================================
ris = helperRISSurface(‘Size’,[Nr Nc],’ElementSpacing’,[dr dc],…
‘ReflectorElement’,phased.IsotropicAntennaElement,’OperatingFrequency’,fc)
ris =
helperRISSurface with properties:

ReflectorElement: [1×1 phased.IsotropicAntennaElement]
Size: [10 20]
ElementSpacing: [0.0054 0.0054]
OperatingFrequency: 2.8000e+10
===================================================================== This is from the matalb documentation of reconfigurable intelligent surfaces. helperRISSurface is function or a structure ? how can i pass parameters?
i tried to rum this and i am getting error here. i have uploaded the screenshots
kindly help me

thank you.

=========================================================================
ris = helperRISSurface(‘Size’,[Nr Nc],’ElementSpacing’,[dr dc],…
‘ReflectorElement’,phased.IsotropicAntennaElement,’OperatingFrequency’,fc)
ris =
helperRISSurface with properties:

ReflectorElement: [1×1 phased.IsotropicAntennaElement]
Size: [10 20]
ElementSpacing: [0.0054 0.0054]
OperatingFrequency: 2.8000e+10
===================================================================== coding in matlab MATLAB Answers — New Questions

​