I am trying to develop a code that will define geometric primitives using equations. the shapes to be identified are, square, circle, rectangle and triangle. When i run my programme it seems to detect all shapes as rectangle.I am trying to develop a code that will define geometric primitives using equations. the shapes to be identified are, square, circle, rectangle and triangle. When i run my programme it seems to detect all shapes as rectangle. I am trying to develop a code that will define geometric primitives using equations. the shapes to be identified are, square, circle, rectangle and triangle. When i run my programme it seems to detect all shapes as rectangle. image processing MATLAB Answers — New Questions

​

I am trying to generate code from a Simulink model using PLCnext Target for Simulink.
The model runs correctly in simulation, but code generation fails during the build process.
The build stops with the following error:
The call to pxc_plcn_make_rtw_hook, during the exit hook generated the following error:
Unrecognized method, property, or field ‘Identifier’ for class ‘MException’.

The build process will terminate as a result.
Caused by:
Unrecognized method, property, or field ‘Identifier’ for class ‘MException’.
This happens when runs “generate code”
Model configuration:
System target file: pxc_plcn.tlc
Template makefile: pxc_plcn.tmf
Generate code only: enabled
Language: C++
The error appears in the pxc_plcn_make_rtw_hook during the exit hook phase.
Is this related to an incompatibility between the PLCnext Target for Simulink and the MATLAB version, or is there a known issue with this hook?I am trying to generate code from a Simulink model using PLCnext Target for Simulink.
The model runs correctly in simulation, but code generation fails during the build process.
The build stops with the following error:
The call to pxc_plcn_make_rtw_hook, during the exit hook generated the following error:
Unrecognized method, property, or field ‘Identifier’ for class ‘MException’.

The build process will terminate as a result.
Caused by:
Unrecognized method, property, or field ‘Identifier’ for class ‘MException’.
This happens when runs “generate code”
Model configuration:
System target file: pxc_plcn.tlc
Template makefile: pxc_plcn.tmf
Generate code only: enabled
Language: C++
The error appears in the pxc_plcn_make_rtw_hook during the exit hook phase.
Is this related to an incompatibility between the PLCnext Target for Simulink and the MATLAB version, or is there a known issue with this hook? I am trying to generate code from a Simulink model using PLCnext Target for Simulink.
The model runs correctly in simulation, but code generation fails during the build process.
The build stops with the following error:
The call to pxc_plcn_make_rtw_hook, during the exit hook generated the following error:
Unrecognized method, property, or field ‘Identifier’ for class ‘MException’.

The build process will terminate as a result.
Caused by:
Unrecognized method, property, or field ‘Identifier’ for class ‘MException’.
This happens when runs “generate code”
Model configuration:
System target file: pxc_plcn.tlc
Template makefile: pxc_plcn.tmf
Generate code only: enabled
Language: C++
The error appears in the pxc_plcn_make_rtw_hook during the exit hook phase.
Is this related to an incompatibility between the PLCnext Target for Simulink and the MATLAB version, or is there a known issue with this hook? simulink, code-generation, plcnext MATLAB Answers — New Questions

​

And the classical variables are:

The bvp4c code of the problem is:
function sisko5
% Parameter initialization
A = 1;
M = 1;
n = 2;
m = 1;
gamma = 1;
Nt = 1;
Nb = 1;
GrT = 1;
GrC = 2;
Rd = 1;
Sc = 1;
Pr = 1;
Ec = 1;

% Constant calculation
Costant = (m*(2*n – 1) + 1) / (n + 1);

% System of ODE
function dydx = odefun(~, y)
%f = y(1), f’ = y(2), f” = y(3), theta = y(4), theta’ = y(5), phi = y(6), phi’ = y(7)
dydx = zeros(7, 1);
dydx(1) = y(2);
dydx(2) = y(3);
dydx(3) = (-Costant*y(1)*y(3) + m*y(2)^2 – GrT*y(4) – GrC*y(6) + M*y(2))/(A + n*(-y(3))^(n-1));
dydx(4) = y(5);
dydx(5) = (-Costant*y(1)*y(5) – Nb*y(5)*y(7) – Nt*y(5)^2 – Ec*A*y(3)^2 – Ec*(-y(3))^(n+1) – M*Ec*y(2)^2)/((1+4/3*Rd)/Pr);
dydx(6) = y(7);
dydx(7) = -Sc*Costant*y(1)*y(7) – (Nt/Nb)*dydx(5) + gamma*y(6);
end
% Nested function: Boundary conditions
function res = bcfun(ya, yb)
res = zeros(7, 1);
res(1) = ya(2)-1; % y(2) = 1 at eta = 0
res(2) = ya(1); % y(1) = 0 at eta = 0
res(3) = ya(4)-1; % y(4) = 1 at eta = 0
res(4) = Nb*ya(7) + Nt*ya(5); % Boundary condition at eta = 0
res(5) = yb(2); % y(2) = 0 at eta = 10
res(6) = yb(4); % y(4) = 0 at eta = 10
res(7) = yb(6); % y(6) = 0 at eta = 10
end
solinit=bvpinit(linspace(0,10,10),[0 0 0 0 0 0 0]);
sol=bvp4c(@odefun,@bcfun,solinit);
eta=linspace(0,10,100);
y=deval(sol,eta);
plot(eta,y(6,:))
end
Is it possible to do plot under variation of parameter in bvp4c method? It has been a chalenge for me honestly. Can anyone help my good peolple?And the classical variables are:

The bvp4c code of the problem is:
function sisko5
% Parameter initialization
A = 1;
M = 1;
n = 2;
m = 1;
gamma = 1;
Nt = 1;
Nb = 1;
GrT = 1;
GrC = 2;
Rd = 1;
Sc = 1;
Pr = 1;
Ec = 1;

% Constant calculation
Costant = (m*(2*n – 1) + 1) / (n + 1);

% System of ODE
function dydx = odefun(~, y)
%f = y(1), f’ = y(2), f” = y(3), theta = y(4), theta’ = y(5), phi = y(6), phi’ = y(7)
dydx = zeros(7, 1);
dydx(1) = y(2);
dydx(2) = y(3);
dydx(3) = (-Costant*y(1)*y(3) + m*y(2)^2 – GrT*y(4) – GrC*y(6) + M*y(2))/(A + n*(-y(3))^(n-1));
dydx(4) = y(5);
dydx(5) = (-Costant*y(1)*y(5) – Nb*y(5)*y(7) – Nt*y(5)^2 – Ec*A*y(3)^2 – Ec*(-y(3))^(n+1) – M*Ec*y(2)^2)/((1+4/3*Rd)/Pr);
dydx(6) = y(7);
dydx(7) = -Sc*Costant*y(1)*y(7) – (Nt/Nb)*dydx(5) + gamma*y(6);
end
% Nested function: Boundary conditions
function res = bcfun(ya, yb)
res = zeros(7, 1);
res(1) = ya(2)-1; % y(2) = 1 at eta = 0
res(2) = ya(1); % y(1) = 0 at eta = 0
res(3) = ya(4)-1; % y(4) = 1 at eta = 0
res(4) = Nb*ya(7) + Nt*ya(5); % Boundary condition at eta = 0
res(5) = yb(2); % y(2) = 0 at eta = 10
res(6) = yb(4); % y(4) = 0 at eta = 10
res(7) = yb(6); % y(6) = 0 at eta = 10
end
solinit=bvpinit(linspace(0,10,10),[0 0 0 0 0 0 0]);
sol=bvp4c(@odefun,@bcfun,solinit);
eta=linspace(0,10,100);
y=deval(sol,eta);
plot(eta,y(6,:))
end
Is it possible to do plot under variation of parameter in bvp4c method? It has been a chalenge for me honestly. Can anyone help my good peolple? And the classical variables are:

The bvp4c code of the problem is:
function sisko5
% Parameter initialization
A = 1;
M = 1;
n = 2;
m = 1;
gamma = 1;
Nt = 1;
Nb = 1;
GrT = 1;
GrC = 2;
Rd = 1;
Sc = 1;
Pr = 1;
Ec = 1;

% Constant calculation
Costant = (m*(2*n – 1) + 1) / (n + 1);

% System of ODE
function dydx = odefun(~, y)
%f = y(1), f’ = y(2), f” = y(3), theta = y(4), theta’ = y(5), phi = y(6), phi’ = y(7)
dydx = zeros(7, 1);
dydx(1) = y(2);
dydx(2) = y(3);
dydx(3) = (-Costant*y(1)*y(3) + m*y(2)^2 – GrT*y(4) – GrC*y(6) + M*y(2))/(A + n*(-y(3))^(n-1));
dydx(4) = y(5);
dydx(5) = (-Costant*y(1)*y(5) – Nb*y(5)*y(7) – Nt*y(5)^2 – Ec*A*y(3)^2 – Ec*(-y(3))^(n+1) – M*Ec*y(2)^2)/((1+4/3*Rd)/Pr);
dydx(6) = y(7);
dydx(7) = -Sc*Costant*y(1)*y(7) – (Nt/Nb)*dydx(5) + gamma*y(6);
end
% Nested function: Boundary conditions
function res = bcfun(ya, yb)
res = zeros(7, 1);
res(1) = ya(2)-1; % y(2) = 1 at eta = 0
res(2) = ya(1); % y(1) = 0 at eta = 0
res(3) = ya(4)-1; % y(4) = 1 at eta = 0
res(4) = Nb*ya(7) + Nt*ya(5); % Boundary condition at eta = 0
res(5) = yb(2); % y(2) = 0 at eta = 10
res(6) = yb(4); % y(4) = 0 at eta = 10
res(7) = yb(6); % y(6) = 0 at eta = 10
end
solinit=bvpinit(linspace(0,10,10),[0 0 0 0 0 0 0]);
sol=bvp4c(@odefun,@bcfun,solinit);
eta=linspace(0,10,100);
y=deval(sol,eta);
plot(eta,y(6,:))
end
Is it possible to do plot under variation of parameter in bvp4c method? It has been a chalenge for me honestly. Can anyone help my good peolple? bvp4c, fluid dynamics MATLAB Answers — New Questions

​

How do I install an old version of Matlab (2010b I believe) on a brand new HP desktop running Windows 11? I have the original CDs, but not a valid PLP. (personal license passcode). LeoHow do I install an old version of Matlab (2010b I believe) on a brand new HP desktop running Windows 11? I have the original CDs, but not a valid PLP. (personal license passcode). Leo How do I install an old version of Matlab (2010b I believe) on a brand new HP desktop running Windows 11? I have the original CDs, but not a valid PLP. (personal license passcode). Leo install on a new machine MATLAB Answers — New Questions

​

I would like to ask for your guidance regarding my use of the UCIe 2.0 Standard Package Signal Integrity Kit.
In the documentation, a script (run_plotVTF.m) for calculating the VTF is mentioned, as illustrated in the figure below. However, I was not able to locate this file after searching through the provided package.

I also have an additional question: is it possible to run the VTF calculation tool independently, without waiting for the coupled widebus simulation to be completed?
Based on my understanding, the VTF simulation itself is essentially a passive simulation.I would like to ask for your guidance regarding my use of the UCIe 2.0 Standard Package Signal Integrity Kit.
In the documentation, a script (run_plotVTF.m) for calculating the VTF is mentioned, as illustrated in the figure below. However, I was not able to locate this file after searching through the provided package.

I also have an additional question: is it possible to run the VTF calculation tool independently, without waiting for the coupled widebus simulation to be completed?
Based on my understanding, the VTF simulation itself is essentially a passive simulation. I would like to ask for your guidance regarding my use of the UCIe 2.0 Standard Package Signal Integrity Kit.
In the documentation, a script (run_plotVTF.m) for calculating the VTF is mentioned, as illustrated in the figure below. However, I was not able to locate this file after searching through the provided package.

I also have an additional question: is it possible to run the VTF calculation tool independently, without waiting for the coupled widebus simulation to be completed?
Based on my understanding, the VTF simulation itself is essentially a passive simulation. ucie 2.0, parallel link designer, vtf, script MATLAB Answers — New Questions

​

I would like to have Simulink act as a Client connected to a Net without any hardware using the PCAN-Developer 4 API, which is specified in the link below:

https://www.peak-system.com/products/software/development-packages/pcan-developer/?L=1

Is this currently supported with MATLAB and Simulink?I would like to have Simulink act as a Client connected to a Net without any hardware using the PCAN-Developer 4 API, which is specified in the link below:

https://www.peak-system.com/products/software/development-packages/pcan-developer/?L=1

Is this currently supported with MATLAB and Simulink? I would like to have Simulink act as a Client connected to a Net without any hardware using the PCAN-Developer 4 API, which is specified in the link below:

https://www.peak-system.com/products/software/development-packages/pcan-developer/?L=1

Is this currently supported with MATLAB and Simulink? vehiclenetworktoolbox, simulink, pcan MATLAB Answers — New Questions

​

Hi everyone,
I’m currently learning to build control modules using Simulink and MATLAB. I was wondering if anyone has experience with or access to BCM, VCU, or other control module models in Simulink.
If you have any models (especially with sensor data integration) that you can share, it would be really helpful. I’m currently using MATLAB 2021a.
Thanks in advance!Hi everyone,
I’m currently learning to build control modules using Simulink and MATLAB. I was wondering if anyone has experience with or access to BCM, VCU, or other control module models in Simulink.
If you have any models (especially with sensor data integration) that you can share, it would be really helpful. I’m currently using MATLAB 2021a.
Thanks in advance! Hi everyone,
I’m currently learning to build control modules using Simulink and MATLAB. I was wondering if anyone has experience with or access to BCM, VCU, or other control module models in Simulink.
If you have any models (especially with sensor data integration) that you can share, it would be really helpful. I’m currently using MATLAB 2021a.
Thanks in advance! vcu, ecu, bcm MATLAB Answers — New Questions

​

How to get the privilege test status indicatoe to green so that the next provedure ocuresHow to get the privilege test status indicatoe to green so that the next provedure ocures How to get the privilege test status indicatoe to green so that the next provedure ocures pi sudo MATLAB Answers — New Questions

​

Consider two tools that add annotations to a plot. Both toolA and toolB add annotations that are sensitive to the current YLim of the axis. toolA and toolB are completely independent. Either one or both may be used on any given plot.
Both tools add annotations that must be placed relative to one another within their set. For example, a series of labels that "stair step" down as the x-axis increases. So the position of any individual label has some dependence on the "previous" label (text object).
I have found that just adding a listener on YLim PostSet is insufficient, as the "Restore View" for zoom does not stimulate that callback. I have found I also need the same callback(s) invoked if the figure size is changed. I am aware of the LimitsChanged callback for axis objects and the SizeChanged callback for the figure objects, but as far as I can tell they can only point to a single callback function, not a list of functions.
I have figured out some rather hacky ways to handle this use case, but I’m wondering if there is a preferred method for doing something like this. It seems that addlistener would be the preferred way as that doesn’t overwrite a property, but I’ve been unable to find a way to get that to reliably work for all use cases (like zooming and figure resizing).
[Note that I am currently using R2022b, but there are others in our group that currently need to use MATLAB as old as R2018b. We have a number of mission-critical tools that need to be recertified if the version of MATLAB changes, so there can be lags adopting the lastest version of MATLAB.]Consider two tools that add annotations to a plot. Both toolA and toolB add annotations that are sensitive to the current YLim of the axis. toolA and toolB are completely independent. Either one or both may be used on any given plot.
Both tools add annotations that must be placed relative to one another within their set. For example, a series of labels that "stair step" down as the x-axis increases. So the position of any individual label has some dependence on the "previous" label (text object).
I have found that just adding a listener on YLim PostSet is insufficient, as the "Restore View" for zoom does not stimulate that callback. I have found I also need the same callback(s) invoked if the figure size is changed. I am aware of the LimitsChanged callback for axis objects and the SizeChanged callback for the figure objects, but as far as I can tell they can only point to a single callback function, not a list of functions.
I have figured out some rather hacky ways to handle this use case, but I’m wondering if there is a preferred method for doing something like this. It seems that addlistener would be the preferred way as that doesn’t overwrite a property, but I’ve been unable to find a way to get that to reliably work for all use cases (like zooming and figure resizing).
[Note that I am currently using R2022b, but there are others in our group that currently need to use MATLAB as old as R2018b. We have a number of mission-critical tools that need to be recertified if the version of MATLAB changes, so there can be lags adopting the lastest version of MATLAB.] Consider two tools that add annotations to a plot. Both toolA and toolB add annotations that are sensitive to the current YLim of the axis. toolA and toolB are completely independent. Either one or both may be used on any given plot.
Both tools add annotations that must be placed relative to one another within their set. For example, a series of labels that "stair step" down as the x-axis increases. So the position of any individual label has some dependence on the "previous" label (text object).
I have found that just adding a listener on YLim PostSet is insufficient, as the "Restore View" for zoom does not stimulate that callback. I have found I also need the same callback(s) invoked if the figure size is changed. I am aware of the LimitsChanged callback for axis objects and the SizeChanged callback for the figure objects, but as far as I can tell they can only point to a single callback function, not a list of functions.
I have figured out some rather hacky ways to handle this use case, but I’m wondering if there is a preferred method for doing something like this. It seems that addlistener would be the preferred way as that doesn’t overwrite a property, but I’ve been unable to find a way to get that to reliably work for all use cases (like zooming and figure resizing).
[Note that I am currently using R2022b, but there are others in our group that currently need to use MATLAB as old as R2018b. We have a number of mission-critical tools that need to be recertified if the version of MATLAB changes, so there can be lags adopting the lastest version of MATLAB.] callback, figure MATLAB Answers — New Questions

​

How do I access my Online Training Suite?How do I access my Online Training Suite? How do I access my Online Training Suite?  MATLAB Answers — New Questions

​