M365 Summit Manchester 2024 – Microsoft Cloud Engineering Bootcamp Agenda is focused on building robust enterprise solutions providing zero to hero deep dive sessions on Microsoft 365, Azure, A.I., Cyber security, Power BI Data Science, Power Platform Low Code Development & Dynamics 365 Bootcamps. The Microsoft Conference will take place at University Academy 92, Brian Statham Way, Manchester M16 0PU

https://m365summit.powercommunity.com/

Track 1 – Microsoft 365 Enterprise

Track 2 – A.I. Bootcamp

Track 3 – Cyber Security

Track 4 – Azure

Track 5 – DevOps

Track 6 – Power Platform

Track 7 – PoweBI

Track 8 – Productivity & Project Management

​M365 Summit Manchester 2024 – Microsoft Cloud Engineering Bootcamp Agenda is focused on building robust enterprise solutions providing zero to hero deep dive sessions on Microsoft 365, Azure, A.I., Cyber security, Power BI Data Science, Power Platform Low Code Development & Dynamics 365 Bootcamps. The Microsoft Conference will take place at University Academy 92, Brian Statham Way, Manchester M16 0PU
https://m365summit.powercommunity.com/
Track 1 – Microsoft 365 Enterprise
Track 2 – A.I. Bootcamp
Track 3 – Cyber Security
Track 4 – Azure
Track 5 – DevOps
Track 6 – Power Platform
Track 7 – PoweBI
Track 8 – Productivity & Project Management  Read More

​

Hello! This is my first time posting looking for solutions, I hope I can explain my problem properly.

I was working on a document in Word when I realized all the page numbers were off as they kept restarting at 1 and I didn’t have any good reason why. After reading through a few forums here I figured out how to check for section breaks – which could reset my page count. This was the problem! And while I still can’t figure out how to delete section breaks (I have tried every version offered here, I am using a 2020 macbook air with microsoft word Version 16.88 (24081116) if that matters), I could just go through to each new section and manually change the page count formatting from “start at..” to “continue from previous”. 

This did help but didn’t make sense as I didn’t create any section breaks. I think they’re being automatically created as some of my text is in 2 columns and some is not, so I think the program is just turning the columned bits into their own section. Annoying to do individually but not un-fixable, or so I thought. 

I carried on for another hour or two and realized the numbers were all off again. I go to manually change all the page numbers and find that one page is on Section 5 while the next page is on Section 7 with no Section 6 to be found, disrupting the flow of my numbers once again. I’ve looked at it through draft, outline and regular view (with the print marks turned on) and there is no hint of sneaky Section 6. I’ve deleted text and moved things around and it’s still eluding me, hiding in the netherworld between those pages and taunting me with the restarted page numbers. 

The screen shot below is of the dark void where Section 6 hides. This feels like a cruel prank. 

I don’t want Microsoft word to break me and this has been too much time spent down a rabbit hole chasing Section 6 which should instead be spent working on my thesis. I’d like to put this out there and continue with my work in the hopes that some tech wizard can save me and my sanity. Could someone tell me how I could:

Find a way to make all page numbers ‘continue from the previous section’ automatically? I’m hoping there’s some obvious way to do this, a quick way to change them all at once rather than doing it individually and not worry about my ghost section. Find Section 6 and bring it to justiceDelete rogue sections on my computer

Hopefully this all made sense, it doesn’t to me. Thank you so much! 

​Hello! This is my first time posting looking for solutions, I hope I can explain my problem properly. I was working on a document in Word when I realized all the page numbers were off as they kept restarting at 1 and I didn’t have any good reason why. After reading through a few forums here I figured out how to check for section breaks – which could reset my page count. This was the problem! And while I still can’t figure out how to delete section breaks (I have tried every version offered here, I am using a 2020 macbook air with microsoft word Version 16.88 (24081116) if that matters), I could just go through to each new section and manually change the page count formatting from “start at..” to “continue from previous”.  This did help but didn’t make sense as I didn’t create any section breaks. I think they’re being automatically created as some of my text is in 2 columns and some is not, so I think the program is just turning the columned bits into their own section. Annoying to do individually but not un-fixable, or so I thought.  I carried on for another hour or two and realized the numbers were all off again. I go to manually change all the page numbers and find that one page is on Section 5 while the next page is on Section 7 with no Section 6 to be found, disrupting the flow of my numbers once again. I’ve looked at it through draft, outline and regular view (with the print marks turned on) and there is no hint of sneaky Section 6. I’ve deleted text and moved things around and it’s still eluding me, hiding in the netherworld between those pages and taunting me with the restarted page numbers.  The screen shot below is of the dark void where Section 6 hides. This feels like a cruel prank.  I don’t want Microsoft word to break me and this has been too much time spent down a rabbit hole chasing Section 6 which should instead be spent working on my thesis. I’d like to put this out there and continue with my work in the hopes that some tech wizard can save me and my sanity. Could someone tell me how I could:Find a way to make all page numbers ‘continue from the previous section’ automatically? I’m hoping there’s some obvious way to do this, a quick way to change them all at once rather than doing it individually and not worry about my ghost section. Find Section 6 and bring it to justiceDelete rogue sections on my computerHopefully this all made sense, it doesn’t to me. Thank you so much!   Read More

​

I am trying to deploy a LoB program for a customer that have a Windows Configuration, WDA Application Control policy setup in M365.

The program, High QA, has path and publisher allows in the policy, and it opens without issue.

The error is encountered when you open a file inside th application, nothing loads but the Event Viewer, Code Integrity/Operational catches the following error:

…InspectionManager.exe is trying to load In_Memory_PE_File which failed the dynamic code trust verification with error code 0xC0E9002.

The policy has the Dynamic Code Security option enabled.

I am hoping there is something that can be done other than turning that option off?

Thanks in advance.

​I am trying to deploy a LoB program for a customer that have a Windows Configuration, WDA Application Control policy setup in M365. The program, High QA, has path and publisher allows in the policy, and it opens without issue.The error is encountered when you open a file inside th application, nothing loads but the Event Viewer, Code Integrity/Operational catches the following error: …InspectionManager.exe is trying to load In_Memory_PE_File which failed the dynamic code trust verification with error code 0xC0E9002. The policy has the Dynamic Code Security option enabled. I am hoping there is something that can be done other than turning that option off? Thanks in advance.  Read More

​

Hello everyone,

I’m new here, but not to Word.  Hoping I can get some help with a problem I haven’t found a solution for yet.  I have some 4″ x 6″ C-Line photo pages that include some tearable cardstock inserts that you can write on or type on and then insert into the page (this is their product # 52564 if you are interested in seeing yourself).  The inserts are on a perforated sheet 7″ wide by 10″ tall and there are 10 inserts per sheet, only 1 insert wide.  

I figured I could create a custom label template as follows and use that:

When I start a new document using this label template, on screen it looks exactly like the insert sheets:

The problem is that I would like to center the text vertically on each “label” before centering it horizontally.  Unfortunately, every attempt I have made has been unsuccessful.  All text is started at the very top of each insert/”label”.  I’ve tried typing out my text and then using Layout>Page Setup>Layout>Page Alignment to center the text, but it simply shifts everything down and prevents the use of the bottom/10th insert:

Are my settings correct for the “label” template?Is there a way to set the label template as vertically centered versus top alignment?Should I be looking elsewhere to vertically center any text I type in?Any other advice on how to solve this problem?

Greatly appreciated in advance.  

​Hello everyone, I’m new here, but not to Word.  Hoping I can get some help with a problem I haven’t found a solution for yet.  I have some 4″ x 6″ C-Line photo pages that include some tearable cardstock inserts that you can write on or type on and then insert into the page (this is their product # 52564 if you are interested in seeing yourself).  The inserts are on a perforated sheet 7″ wide by 10″ tall and there are 10 inserts per sheet, only 1 insert wide.     I figured I could create a custom label template as follows and use that:  When I start a new document using this label template, on screen it looks exactly like the insert sheets:  The problem is that I would like to center the text vertically on each “label” before centering it horizontally.  Unfortunately, every attempt I have made has been unsuccessful.  All text is started at the very top of each insert/”label”.  I’ve tried typing out my text and then using Layout>Page Setup>Layout>Page Alignment to center the text, but it simply shifts everything down and prevents the use of the bottom/10th insert: Are my settings correct for the “label” template?Is there a way to set the label template as vertically centered versus top alignment?Should I be looking elsewhere to vertically center any text I type in?Any other advice on how to solve this problem?Greatly appreciated in advance.      Read More

​

I have 10 trucks that needs a components replacement for every cummaltive 60000km. I have my trucks in column A. Amd cumulative kms by month in the rest of the columns. The trucks needs a components replacement at every cummaltive 60000km. So it becomes 120000kms for the the service and 180000kms for one after that.I want to use a formulae to highlight in which month would we need a component replacement based on every 60000kms but it’s cummaltive requiment of 60000kms . What formulaes/conditional formatting or other formulae can I use in my cummalive monthly information per truck to flag or highlight the month that we reach the cummaltive 60000kms requirements?

​I have 10 trucks that needs a components replacement for every cummaltive 60000km. I have my trucks in column A. Amd cumulative kms by month in the rest of the columns. The trucks needs a components replacement at every cummaltive 60000km. So it becomes 120000kms for the the service and 180000kms for one after that.I want to use a formulae to highlight in which month would we need a component replacement based on every 60000kms but it’s cummaltive requiment of 60000kms . What formulaes/conditional formatting or other formulae can I use in my cummalive monthly information per truck to flag or highlight the month that we reach the cummaltive 60000kms requirements?  Read More

​

Using Excel for Mac, version 16.88, License: Microsoft 365, 2024

I have a large spreadsheet (approx 30,000 rows).  

1) I need search by Date (A) to find transactions in April.  

2) Then I need to search Employee ID (B) to find how many unique employees had a transaction, and add Amount (C) for every unique user.

3) I then need to record them in the correct data set, such as Under 500 or 500-1000.

So in the below example, I wanted to find how many employees spend 500 or less in April.  I see that Employee 112233 has 2 transactions in April, so I need to add C2 and C4 together.  The total is less than 500, so I will include them  in the calculation in B16 (# of employees) and C16 (Amount).  I would also add B5 & C5 to the April 500 & Under total.   However, it would not add the data from Row 6 since the totals for those transactions are over 500 in April.

 A BC1DateEmployee IDAmount2April1122334003April4477226004April112233505April2255881006April3355997007May4477225508May9977442509May55667710010May55667725011May112244800     EXAMPLE OF OUTPUT  500 and below:  Date# EmployeesTotal16April255017May2600     501-1000  20April2130021May21350

​Using Excel for Mac, version 16.88, License: Microsoft 365, 2024I have a large spreadsheet (approx 30,000 rows).  1) I need search by Date (A) to find transactions in April.  2) Then I need to search Employee ID (B) to find how many unique employees had a transaction, and add Amount (C) for every unique user.3) I then need to record them in the correct data set, such as Under 500 or 500-1000. So in the below example, I wanted to find how many employees spend 500 or less in April.  I see that Employee 112233 has 2 transactions in April, so I need to add C2 and C4 together.  The total is less than 500, so I will include them  in the calculation in B16 (# of employees) and C16 (Amount).  I would also add B5 & C5 to the April 500 & Under total.   However, it would not add the data from Row 6 since the totals for those transactions are over 500 in April.  A BC1DateEmployee IDAmount2April1122334003April4477226004April112233505April2255881006April3355997007May4477225508May9977442509May55667710010May55667725011May112244800     EXAMPLE OF OUTPUT  500 and below:  Date# EmployeesTotal16April255017May2600     501-1000  20April2130021May21350   Read More

​

Hello internet.

My mind is completely blown by this!

I have a PowerAutomate that sets some ‘compose’ actions and then uses them to start a job.  It is a PowerShell 7.2 script running in a Runbook extension-based hybrid worker on a Debian 11 Azure VM.

I’ve reduced the script to just printing the inputted variable values.  That’s all, yet it provides them transposed!

param
(
[string] $siteNAME,
[string] $OMd,
[string] $userNAME,
[string] $templateNAME
)
$scriptVERSION = “x.y.z”
function WO { write-output $wriOU }
write-output “———————————-“
$wriOU = “siteNAME: “+$($siteNAME);WO
$wriOU = “OMd: “+$($OMd);WO
$wriOU = “userNAME: “+$($userNAME);WO
$wriOU = “templateNAME: “+$($templateNAME);WO
write-output “———————————-“
$wriOU = “Script Version: [ “+$scriptVERSION+” ]”;WO
write-output “-end of line-“
#EOF

As you can see ‘siteNAME’ retains the value correctly.  But then ‘OMd’, ‘username’, and ‘templateNAME’ go sides so hard…  Why?  What am I doing wrong, this seems super odd…

Any insight is greaaaatly appreciated.

TY!

​Hello internet. My mind is completely blown by this! I have a PowerAutomate that sets some ‘compose’ actions and then uses them to start a job.  It is a PowerShell 7.2 script running in a Runbook extension-based hybrid worker on a Debian 11 Azure VM. I’ve reduced the script to just printing the inputted variable values.  That’s all, yet it provides them transposed!    param
(
[string] $siteNAME,
[string] $OMd,
[string] $userNAME,
[string] $templateNAME
)
$scriptVERSION = “x.y.z”
function WO { write-output $wriOU }
write-output “———————————-“
$wriOU = “siteNAME: “+$($siteNAME);WO
$wriOU = “OMd: “+$($OMd);WO
$wriOU = “userNAME: “+$($userNAME);WO
$wriOU = “templateNAME: “+$($templateNAME);WO
write-output “———————————-“
$wriOU = “Script Version: [ “+$scriptVERSION+” ]”;WO
write-output “-end of line-“
#EOF      As you can see ‘siteNAME’ retains the value correctly.  But then ‘OMd’, ‘username’, and ‘templateNAME’ go sides so hard…  Why?  What am I doing wrong, this seems super odd… Any insight is greaaaatly appreciated. TY!  Read More

​

This Blog Post was authored by David Burg, Principal Software Engineer, with contributions of Harold Campos, Principal PM.

Business growth, is achieved not only by extending towards more scalable, elastic, and modern, cloud-based solutions but also by preserving existing business value and harnessing it. This translates into leveraging existing key legacy assets. That is where Azure Logic Apps has emerged as a platform for building workflows, orchestrate diverse types of systems, and integrate legacy systems with all generations of services, even Artificial Intelligence (AI) solutions.

One common scenario is integrating with legacy Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) services, especially for enterprises transitioning from BizTalk Server to Azure Logic Apps. In this guide, we’ll explore how to integrate SOAP services with Azure Logic Apps using Azure API Management (APIM) as a bridge. We’ll walk through the integration setup with a vanilla SOAP service and cover key considerations for customers migrating from BizTalk Server.

Why Use Azure API Management (APIM) for SOAP Services?

SOAP services are typically older, legacy systems that use XML messaging. This was a natural integration point for BizTalk Server which itself had XML as a native document exchange format. BizTalk Server also supports consuming and publishing SOAP services.

While Azure Logic Apps natively supports REST and other modern protocols, SOAP services integration requires additional setup. Conversely, Azure API Management (APIM) provides an efficient way to expose SOAP services as RESTful APIs, enabling seamless interaction between SOAP and Logic Apps. This not only helps you integrate legacy systems but also leverages the management and monitoring capabilities of APIM.

What about Logic Apps’ built-in SOAP to REST?

Azure Logic Apps provides a built-in WSDL import capability that simplifies the process of connecting to SOAP services by automatically generating a custom connector. While this is a convenient solution for simple SOAP services, there are limitations when dealing with more complex services or when customers need greater control over the integration workflow. Here’s an explanation of why the WSDL import approach may fall short in those scenarios and how using Azure API Management (APIM) with SOAP-to-REST conversion provides more flexibility and scalability.

Benefits for Simple Services:

Ease of Use: The built-in WSDL import in Logic Apps offers a straightforward way to connect to SOAP services without the need for extensive configuration. The connector is automatically generated from the WSDL file, simplifying the workflow design process.
Quick Setup: For simple SOAP services with straightforward operations and data structures, this method reduces setup time by automatically handling the SOAP to REST conversion and generating an API endpoint internally.
No Additional Infrastructure: Since the connector is generated directly within Logic Apps, there’s no need to set up or maintain an external service like API Management, making it a lightweight option for basic use cases.

Limitations for Complex Services or Customization Needs:

Lack of Customization and Control:

The WSDL import process generates default REST endpoints based on the SOAP operations, but customers have limited ability to customize these endpoints.
When complex transformations, routing rules, or authentication mechanisms are required, the auto-generated connector lacks the flexibility to handle such scenarios.
You cannot modify the underlying REST API definitions, policies, or behaviors created by the import tool, which can be problematic if specific logic needs to be applied to the request/response flow or if certain optimizations are necessary for performance.

Scaling for Complex Services:

In cases where the SOAP service has intricate operations, nested data structures, or requires custom headers and authentication, the auto-generated custom connector may not handle all the nuances effectively. Customers sometime need to apply custom transformations or policies, which the Logic App WSDL import does not allow.
As the number of operations and the complexity of the SOAP service grows, the logic within the auto-generated connector becomes harder to maintain or troubleshoot, especially without visibility into or control over the underlying API structure.

Lack of Advanced Policies:

The built-in Logic Apps connector does not have control for applying policies such as rate limiting, authorization, or custom request handling, which are sometime required for large-scale enterprise applications.
API Management offers advanced features such as caching, request/response validation, throttling, and retry policies. These can be essential for scaling integrations or optimizing performance, particularly when integrating with SOAP services that have higher latency or are mission-critical.

Preview release:

At the time of this writing, the Logic App SOAP custom connector is a preview feature. Preview features aren’t meant for production use.
API Management offers production support for its SOAP to REST feature, which has been promoted to Generally Available many years ago.

Step-by-Step Guide: Integrating a SOAP Service with Logic Apps via APIM

Here’s how to integrate a SOAP service with Azure Logic Apps using APIM.

Step 1: Setup an API Management Instance

Create an API Management instance in your Azure portal:

Navigate to Create a resource from the main menu, search and select API Management in the Marketplace.

Fill in the necessary information such as resource group, name, region, and pricing tier (choose based on your needs – all tiers support SOAP to REST).
Once provisioned, navigate to your API Management instance.

Step 2: Import the SOAP Service into APIM

In your APIM instance, go to APIs and select + Add API.
Under Create from definition, select WSDL.

Import your WSDL (Web Services Description Language) file:

In WSDL specification, enter the URL to your SOAP API, or select Select a file to select a local WSDL file.

If you do not have a SOAP service to test with, see the links at the bottom of this blog post for a sample SOAP service hosted by Microsoft, and a guide on how to create your own test SOAP service.

Under Import method, select SOAP to REST (or SOAP Pass-Through) depending on your needs. SOAP to REST is recommended as it simplifies the service for integration with Logic Apps.

APIM will automatically parse the WSDL, creating the necessary API structure and operations.

Review the API definitions and adjust the endpoint as necessary. Enter other API settings. You can set the values during creation or configure them later by going to the Settings tab.

Step 3: Obtain the REST swagger for the new APIM API

Export the Swagger Definition:

On the APIs section of your APIM instance, look for the Export option in the context menu (icon …) next to your new API.

Choose OpenAPI v2 (JSON) from the available formats.
You can then download the Swagger (OpenAPI) specification file, which contains all the REST endpoints and their operations derived from the WSDL import.

Alternatively, you can also export the Swagger file programmatically via the APIM REST API or its Az PowerShell cmdlet (see documentation link at the bottom of this article).

Step 4a: (Optionally) Import the REST API as Custom connector

Note: The advantage of using a custom connector from a Swagger file in Logic Apps, compared to handcrafting HTTP calls, is ease of use and efficiency. Custom connectors automatically generate actions based on the Swagger definition, providing a structured interface with predefined parameters, making it simpler and faster to configure API calls. They also handle authentication, error handling, and data mapping more seamlessly. Additionally, connectors offer better maintainability by centralizing API changes—any updates to the API definition are reflected in the connector without needing to manually adjust individual HTTP actions, reducing errors and ongoing maintenance efforts.

Some customers may opt not to use Logic App’s Custom Connector for importing an API definition from Azure API Management (APIM) because custom connectors go through a shared platform component. This shared nature means that the connectors are not kept behind a customer’s private VNET, which could be a concern for those prioritizing network isolation and security. Instead, to maintain control over their network boundaries, such customers might choose to manually craft HTTP calls directly within Logic App actions, bypassing the shared connector infrastructure.

Create a Logic Apps Custom Connector from the Azure management portal. This is an Azure resource just like Logic Apps and API Management, and you will find it in the Marketplace as “Logic Apps Custom Connector”.

Once the custom connector is created, it is an empty container, and you need to import the API definition.

Navigate to the custom connector you have created, and select Edit.

Using the OpenAPI specification file from the previous step, select “Upload an OpenAPI file”:

After this import, you may need to adjust the authentication type and details for your API based on the security settings you have configured on your API Management instance. E.g. you may have an API Key based authentication and need to provide the Ocp-Apim-Subscription-Key in the HTTP header.

Step 4b: Create a Logic App to Call the REST API

Create a new Logic App in the Azure portal:

Navigate to Create a resource and select Logic App. You may use either a Consumption Logic App or a Logic App Standard. For the purposes of demonstration and testing, simple production workload easy setup, a Consumption Logic App is available within minutes as a multitenant service and is a pay-as-you-go model. For production scenarios with full control over runtime and performance settings, we recommend Logic App Standard as single-tenant model.

Once the Logic App is provisioned, click on Logic App Designer.

Add a trigger, such as the Request trigger.

Then add an action, which Runtime will depend on how you choose to access the API Management API

If you have imported the REST API as a Custom Connector:

To add the action, select Runtime “Custom”, select your newly created custom connector, then any action within that custom connector (e.g. GetMostRecentOrder from the sample Fazio SOAP service hosted by Microsoft).

Input any required parameters for the SOAP operation converted in a REST action.

If you have not imported the REST API as a Custom Connector, you may still call the API directly with an HTTP call:

Add an action, select Runtime “In-app”, an HTTP Request or HTTP Action as the trigger or action of the Logic App. Alternatively, consider the HTTP + Swagger Action after posting the API Management download swagger definition to an easily accessible endpoint, such as a Azure storage file.
In the HTTP action, configure the request:

Set the Method to `POST` (or GET depending on the SOAP action).
In the URI, specify the REST endpoint from APIM that maps to the desired SOAP operation.
Provide the necessary headers and body payload in JSON format, converted from the SOAP structure.

For either approach:

Test the Logic App by running it and verifying that the response returns data from your SOAP service.

Many SOAP services do not handle exceptions, resulting in 500 Internal Service Error response upon input request parameter validation failure, instead of the 400 Bad Request expected by most modern services. Logic App by default will retry requests failing with 500 HTTP status code. You should consider changing the retry policy of actions calling SOAP to REST endpoints to not retry.

Step 5: Monitor and Debug the Integration

Monitor the Logic App: In the Logic App run history, you can view the execution flow and detailed logs for each step. This helps debug any issues with the API call.
Monitor APIM: Azure API Management provides detailed analytics and monitoring. Use this to track request/response metrics, latency, and errors.

Considerations for customers Migrating from BizTalk to Logic Apps

BizTalk Server and Azure Logic Apps have different architectures. For customers using BizTalk Server, Azure Logic Apps address their core integration needs, while Azure Integration Services (AIS) such as Azure Service Bus, Azure API Management and other Azure services provide not only modernization capabilities but also a massive value-add.

The following illustration depicts a proposed mapping of Azure Logic Apps and AIS product features for BizTalk Server customers.

For customers transitioning from BizTalk Server to Azure Logic Apps, especially those using SOAP services, the following factors should be considered:

Stateful vs. Stateless Workflows: BizTalk Server persists all messages and most orchestrations, while Logic Apps support both stateful and stateless types. To handle long-running workflows, consider using Logic Apps webhook action, polling action patterns or Durable Functions. You may further use Azure Service Bus (or IBM MQ) queues and the Logic App’s built-in Service Bus connector (or the Logic App’s built-in IBM MQ connector) to implement traditional BizTalk messaging patterns. You may break down complex long-running workflows into smaller, more manageable individual workflows. This can help in reducing the execution time of these individual workflows and improve the overall performance.

Message Transformation: BizTalk Server provides built-in capabilities for XML transformations (XSLT) between SOAP messages. In Logic Apps, XML transformations can be achieved using integration accounts or Standard SKU local artifacts to contain maps, and the XSLT transform action. Consider that once you have made the SOAP service available as a REST endpoint to Logic App, the payloads will be in JSON format, not XML. With JSON you can directly assign and pick the tokens in the Logic App Designer. To continue to use XML payloads and transform instead of JSON, you may use the pass-through format of APIM SOAP API import.

Custom Pipelines: BizTalk’s custom pipelines are used for pre-and-post message processing. In Azure Logic Apps with API Management SOAP API, these can be mimicked using API Management policies, Logic Apps’ vast choice of workflow actions, Inline Code action or Azure Functions, and custom connectors for custom logic.

Orchestrations: Azure Logic Apps handle workflow “orchestrations” differently compared to BizTalk’s orchestration engine. You may need to break down BizTalk orchestrations into smaller, modular workflows in Azure Logic Apps. The Azure Logic Apps service includes the built-in ability to call other Logic App workflows.

Performance and Scalability: Azure Logic Apps are built for cloud scalability, but you may need to optimize workflows, especially when integrating with legacy SOAP services, to ensure performance and reliability. For example, Azure Logic Apps implements elastic scaling and can handle large burst workloads, while BizTalk required manual scaling, and advanced capacity planning. This can result in new inbound call pressure on legacy SOAP services, if you do not put concurrency control, sequential execution or adjust for throttling limits on Logic Apps.

Conclusion

Integrating SOAP services with Azure Logic Apps via API Management offers a smooth path for enterprises to modernize their workflows while retaining the value of their legacy systems. By leveraging APIM to expose SOAP services as RESTful APIs, organizations can integrate these services into cloud-based workflows efficiently. Customers migrating from BizTalk Server should consider the key differences in architecture, Azure Logic Apps and AIS features and ensure proper optimization when designing workflows in Azure Logic Apps.

For further reading, refer to the official Microsoft documentation:

Azure Logic Apps documentation
API Management documentation
API Management: Import SOAP API to API Management and convert to REST
Az PowerShell APIM export API
Create an Azure Logic Apps (SOAP) custom connector
Logic Apps: Create a custom connector from an OpenAPI definition
Logic Apps: HTTP + Swagger Action
Logic Apps: Comparing the different workflow types and environments
Example Orders SOAP Service

To get success responses, use the ‘magic’ customer id 1001 and/or the order id 2468. Other values allow you to test error responses from the SOAP service.

How-to: Sample SOAP service with .NET WCF

​Microsoft Tech Community – Latest Blogs –Read More 

Ever since the introduction of Microsoft Copilot, AI is quickly being woven into the workplace and people’s daily work habits. Three-quarters of global knowledge workers already use it, and more than 80% say AI helps them save time, focus on important work, and be more creative, according to the Microsoft 2024 Work Trend Index Annual Report. This presents a huge opportunity for partners that provide software—also referred to as independent software vendors (ISVs). They can now integrate their products directly into employees’ workflows alongside AI early in the adoption curve and establish their apps as vital to the new AI-powered way of working.

Global information and analytics company LexisNexis® is seizing this opportunity and taking multiple paths to bring the power of AI to their customers. First, they are leveraging the extensibility features of Microsoft Copilot for Microsoft 365, which connect apps to Copilot to extend its skills and knowledge. They are also working on a custom engine copilot for Microsoft Teams, as well as exploring additional integrations across the Microsoft 365 ecosystem for the future.

Their approach serves as an example to other partners interested in benefiting from this opportunity to plan and accelerate their own AI development.

LexisNexis meets legal professionals where they work—in Microsoft 365

A key segment of business for LexisNexis is creating solutions for legal clients, both corporate employees and legal professionals, whose work revolves around Microsoft 365 apps. LexisNexis offers several add-ins for Microsoft Word, including its flagship legal document drafting solution, Lexis® Create, and Lexis® Create+ with enriched capabilities, including firm document management system (DMS) connectivity and generative AI capabilities built right in. LexisNexis also offers apps for Teams, including Ask Legal and Lexis® Connect.

Continue reading here

​Microsoft Tech Community – Latest Blogs –Read More 

I’m trying to print 2 logical pages per sheet in landscape mode.

i.e.

Physical paper is Letter (8.5 x 11)

Logical Page is 11 x 4.25

Print in landscape, 2 pages per sheet

But when I print, the output comes out in Landscape mode., but in 2 Column mode, not 2 pages / sheet.

I’ve tried a bunch of different settings, but can’t get it to do this.

I have another App where I do this in Portrait mode, and it works just fine.

​I’m trying to print 2 logical pages per sheet in landscape mode.i.e.Physical paper is Letter (8.5 x 11)Logical Page is 11 x 4.25Print in landscape, 2 pages per sheetBut when I print, the output comes out in Landscape mode., but in 2 Column mode, not 2 pages / sheet. I’ve tried a bunch of different settings, but can’t get it to do this.I have another App where I do this in Portrait mode, and it works just fine.  Read More

​