Tag Archives: microsoft
M365AdoptionUG – Reinventing Communications with AI & Copilot at Microsoft
After meeting Liz and Lisa from the Microsoft ANZ Comms team at the Copilot+PC Launch, they’re excited to join us and take you behind the scenes of how Microsoft uses AI & Copilot to transform everyday work when dealing with their comms programs. They will even go through some of their prompts in this exclusive demonstration.
Afterwards, stick around to hear all the latest on what’s new to Microsoft 365 & the ACM space!
Online Teams Meeting Link: https://aka.ms/M365UG
AGENDA:
12:00 – 12:05 Welcome: Kirsty McGrath
12:05 – 12:50 Speaker: Reinventing Communications with AI & Copilot at Microsoft with Liz Green & Lisa Vu
12:50 – 1:50 What’s New to Microsoft 365 & ACM
1:25 – 1:30 What’s Next & Close: Kirsty McGrath
SYNOPSIS:
Over the last year, Microsoft’s Communications team has been exploring how and where to best apply generative AI across their work – from measurement and reporting through news operations, social media, content creation, and much more. In this session, Liz and Lisa from the Microsoft ANZ Comms team will take you behind the scenes of how Microsoft has approached the use of AI across the discipline, best practices for applying AI to Comms and a sneak peek at some of the tools Microsoft has built internally to transform their work – as well as how they’re making the most of Microsoft Copilot.
BIO:
Lisa Vu is a Communications Manager at Microsoft ANZ, focusing on building brand love for consumer audiences. Her responsibilities include Surface, Copilot, Windows and Bing. She has been working at Microsoft for just over 5 years in roles spanning SMB, marketing and PR.
Liz Greene is the Head of Communications at Microsoft ANZ, where she is responsible for all external communications including corporate communications and issues management, brand and product PR plus owned storytelling for Microsoft’s local business. Before joining Microsoft in 2017, Liz led Communications at Diageo Australia, prior to which she spent six years at Optus working across both Corporate Affairs as well as Internal Communications.
SOCIAL MEDIA:
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lisanhuanvu/ & Elizabeth Greene | LinkedIn
LinkedIn: Kirsty McGrath
X: @M365Adoption, @KirstyMcGrath13,
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Microsoft365Adoption
YouTube: https://aka.ms/M365Adoption or @Microsoft365Adoption
#M365AdoptionUG #M365Adoption #MSFTAdoption #COPILOT #AI #Communications
After meeting Liz and Lisa from the Microsoft ANZ Comms team at the Copilot+PC Launch, they’re excited to join us and take you behind the scenes of how Microsoft uses AI & Copilot to transform everyday work when dealing with their comms programs. They will even go through some of their prompts in this exclusive demonstration.
Afterwards, stick around to hear all the latest on what’s new to Microsoft 365 & the ACM space!
Online Teams Meeting Link: https://aka.ms/M365UG
AGENDA:
12:00 – 12:05 Welcome: Kirsty McGrath
12:05 – 12:50 Speaker: Reinventing Communications with AI & Copilot at Microsoft with Liz Green & Lisa Vu
12:50 – 1:50 What’s New to Microsoft 365 & ACM
1:25 – 1:30 What’s Next & Close: Kirsty McGrath
SYNOPSIS:
Over the last year, Microsoft’s Communications team has been exploring how and where to best apply generative AI across their work – from measurement and reporting through news operations, social media, content creation, and much more. In this session, Liz and Lisa from the Microsoft ANZ Comms team will take you behind the scenes of how Microsoft has approached the use of AI across the discipline, best practices for applying AI to Comms and a sneak peek at some of the tools Microsoft has built internally to transform their work – as well as how they’re making the most of Microsoft Copilot.
BIO:
Lisa Vu is a Communications Manager at Microsoft ANZ, focusing on building brand love for consumer audiences. Her responsibilities include Surface, Copilot, Windows and Bing. She has been working at Microsoft for just over 5 years in roles spanning SMB, marketing and PR.
Liz Greene is the Head of Communications at Microsoft ANZ, where she is responsible for all external communications including corporate communications and issues management, brand and product PR plus owned storytelling for Microsoft’s local business. Before joining Microsoft in 2017, Liz led Communications at Diageo Australia, prior to which she spent six years at Optus working across both Corporate Affairs as well as Internal Communications.
SOCIAL MEDIA:
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lisanhuanvu/ & Elizabeth Greene | LinkedIn
LinkedIn: Kirsty McGrath
X: @M365Adoption, @KirstyMcGrath13,
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Microsoft365Adoption
YouTube: https://aka.ms/M365Adoption or @Microsoft365Adoption
#M365AdoptionUG #M365Adoption #MSFTAdoption #COPILOT #AI #Communications Read More
Feature Request: Ability to mark start and due date of the tasks
Hi To Do Team,
It is possible to mark the Start and Due dates of tasks in Microsoft Outlook. However, no such option exists in the To-Do app. Ideally, if a task falls within the start and due dates, it should appear in my day list.
Thanks,
Manoj Aggarwal
Hi To Do Team, It is possible to mark the Start and Due dates of tasks in Microsoft Outlook. However, no such option exists in the To-Do app. Ideally, if a task falls within the start and due dates, it should appear in my day list. Thanks,Manoj Aggarwal Read More
OUTLOOK FOR MAC
Hi, is there anywhere I can learn specifically about how to best set up rules in outlook for mac? They never seem to work as I expected.
Hi, is there anywhere I can learn specifically about how to best set up rules in outlook for mac? They never seem to work as I expected. Read More
View other library then general on Teams SharePoint site using iPhone
I have created various teams SharePoint sites (using office365 group as a starting block, and creating the Team using the group) then creating additional document library (other then general) on the site, but I cannot to seem to access this library from anywhere while using iPhone. I have tried SharePoint App (I cannot even get to the Teams Sites from the app, only shows com “site” sites), I have tried OneDrive App (that also only shows libraries from com sites only), finally in the Teams app, I can only get to the “General” library, it does not give me an option anywhere to navigate to a different library. Any ideas?
I have created various teams SharePoint sites (using office365 group as a starting block, and creating the Team using the group) then creating additional document library (other then general) on the site, but I cannot to seem to access this library from anywhere while using iPhone. I have tried SharePoint App (I cannot even get to the Teams Sites from the app, only shows com “site” sites), I have tried OneDrive App (that also only shows libraries from com sites only), finally in the Teams app, I can only get to the “General” library, it does not give me an option anywhere to navigate to a different library. Any ideas? Read More
Possible to restore a deleted chatbot?
I did not realise that deleting the chatbot inside powerapps would also delete the chatbot from copilot studio. Is there any way to restore this? I had just finshed it and was ready to present it. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you!
I did not realise that deleting the chatbot inside powerapps would also delete the chatbot from copilot studio. Is there any way to restore this? I had just finshed it and was ready to present it. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you! Read More
Issue with Email Not Recognized as Clickable Link in Microsoft Forms
I am currently creating a form for my research work. When I enter my email address in the subtitle field after the title, it is not being recognized as a clickable link. I have noticed that other email addresses from my institute are correctly recognized as clickable links, but mine is not.
I have ensured that the email is correctly formatted and manually typed it to avoid any hidden formatting issues.I have also tried clearing any formatting, using different browsers, and even recreating the form, but the issue persists.Other email addresses from the same domain are recognized without any problems.
I am using the same email address for creating the form as well. I would greatly appreciate your assistance in resolving this issue as it is crucial for my research work.
Thank you for your time and support. I look forward to your prompt response.
I am currently creating a form for my research work. When I enter my email address in the subtitle field after the title, it is not being recognized as a clickable link. I have noticed that other email addresses from my institute are correctly recognized as clickable links, but mine is not.I have ensured that the email is correctly formatted and manually typed it to avoid any hidden formatting issues.I have also tried clearing any formatting, using different browsers, and even recreating the form, but the issue persists.Other email addresses from the same domain are recognized without any problems.I am using the same email address for creating the form as well. I would greatly appreciate your assistance in resolving this issue as it is crucial for my research work.Thank you for your time and support. I look forward to your prompt response. Read More
جلب الحبيب العنيد ☎️ 01040581277-002- السعودية #
Therefore, my question is how to generate the actual geometry of line variant elements. Maybe it will be good choice to replace the shape of line variant elements using “GTFS To Public Transit Data Model” tool. However, I could not find the available methods to achieve that
Therefore, my question is how to generate the actual geometry of line variant elements. Maybe it will be good choice to replace the shape of line variant elements using “GTFS To Public Transit Data Model” tool. However, I could not find the available methods to achieve that Read More
Graph API with Large Attachment Problem
I am attempting to send an EMail via the O365 Graph API with a large attachment. I am doing this from Access VBA. I have created an upload session and am attempting to upload the attachment in chunks with successive PUTs, but I get an error message. I am sending this command:
PUT httpx://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/me/messages/AAMkADli…(shortened for posting)/attachments/Onboarding_Guide_v12.pdf/createUploadSession
And I receive this error response:
{“error”:{“code”:”BadRequest”,”message”:”Resource not found for the segment ‘createUploadSession’.”,…
Any idea what is wrong with my PUT statement?
Jim
I am attempting to send an EMail via the O365 Graph API with a large attachment. I am doing this from Access VBA. I have created an upload session and am attempting to upload the attachment in chunks with successive PUTs, but I get an error message. I am sending this command: PUT httpx://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/me/messages/AAMkADli…(shortened for posting)/attachments/Onboarding_Guide_v12.pdf/createUploadSession And I receive this error response:{“error”:{“code”:”BadRequest”,”message”:”Resource not found for the segment ‘createUploadSession’.”,… Any idea what is wrong with my PUT statement? Jim Read More
جلب الحبيب العنيد -00973.34028.443 💞رقم شيـخ روحــاني
جلب الحبيب العنيد -00973.34028.443 :revolving_hearts:رقم شيـخ روحــاني
جلب الحبيب العنيد -00973.34028.443 :revolving_hearts:رقم شيـخ روحــاني Read More
Identity Governance > Opt-in Preview Features appears to be malfunctioning
I have two distinctly separate goals:
Prevent administrative assignments of DISABLED access package policy(ies). By default, appropriate Entra Role, including built-in catalog roles, are able to administratively assign users to disabled access package policies.Limit administrative assignment of access packages to catalog roles only – prevent getting around catalog roles. (e.g., prevent GA or Identity Governance Administrator).
I have an access package policy that is used only by administrators to assign users to one resource (security) group: Users who can request access: None (administrator direct assignments only).
Regardless of whether we use elevated to GA, IG Admin, etc., hold an appropriate catalog RBAC role, or any combination thereof, enabling (checking) the following Opt-In Preview Feature disables EVERYONE from administratively being able to assign user(s) to an access package. There is no required approval – nothing. If I uncheck the following option, we’re once again able to administratively assign users from any level and any policy that is disabled.
Error: You don’t meet policy requirements to request this entitlement. (Note: I’m unable to locate the associated Correlation ID)
Lastly, I’ve tested the following in multiple tenants and the behavior is 100% the same. I feel like I’m missing something.
Identity Governance > Entitlement Management > Settings > Opt-in Features
Enforce policy scope setting for admin direct assignments
Enabling this feature will prevent global administrators from adding users to a package that are outside the scope of the selected policy. For example, an attempt to add an external user through a policy that is only configured for internal users will be blocked when this setting is enabled.
1. Identify any workflows in which users require access to a package, but there is no policy that includes them within its scope.
2. Create policies that will include these users.
I have two distinctly separate goals:Prevent administrative assignments of DISABLED access package policy(ies). By default, appropriate Entra Role, including built-in catalog roles, are able to administratively assign users to disabled access package policies.Limit administrative assignment of access packages to catalog roles only – prevent getting around catalog roles. (e.g., prevent GA or Identity Governance Administrator).I have an access package policy that is used only by administrators to assign users to one resource (security) group: Users who can request access: None (administrator direct assignments only).Regardless of whether we use elevated to GA, IG Admin, etc., hold an appropriate catalog RBAC role, or any combination thereof, enabling (checking) the following Opt-In Preview Feature disables EVERYONE from administratively being able to assign user(s) to an access package. There is no required approval – nothing. If I uncheck the following option, we’re once again able to administratively assign users from any level and any policy that is disabled. Error: You don’t meet policy requirements to request this entitlement. (Note: I’m unable to locate the associated Correlation ID)Lastly, I’ve tested the following in multiple tenants and the behavior is 100% the same. I feel like I’m missing something. Identity Governance > Entitlement Management > Settings > Opt-in FeaturesEnforce policy scope setting for admin direct assignmentsEnabling this feature will prevent global administrators from adding users to a package that are outside the scope of the selected policy. For example, an attempt to add an external user through a policy that is only configured for internal users will be blocked when this setting is enabled.1. Identify any workflows in which users require access to a package, but there is no policy that includes them within its scope.2. Create policies that will include these users. Read More
File submit failed for malware analysis.
I have an English learning software that was recently alerted by Microsoft Defender as potential malware.
When I submit it to Microsoft for analysis as requested. The submitted file is in zip and rar format with password set to “infected”.
I have submitted 8 times, using 7zip, bandzip, rar software package, password is in accordance with the requirements. But each time the analyst replied, “Submitted file password is non-standard, please submit a file with password ‘infected'”
I have an English learning software that was recently alerted by Microsoft Defender as potential malware.When I submit it to Microsoft for analysis as requested. The submitted file is in zip and rar format with password set to “infected”.I have submitted 8 times, using 7zip, bandzip, rar software package, password is in accordance with the requirements. But each time the analyst replied, “Submitted file password is non-standard, please submit a file with password ‘infected'” Read More
URL suggestions randomly disappearing
This bug has been happening for probably a month or two.
Randomly once or twice a week, the address bar would stop showing any URL suggestions when I’m typing.
Regardless of what I type, it just doesn’t show anything. A simple restart fixes it, but clearly this is a bug.
This bug has been happening for probably a month or two.Randomly once or twice a week, the address bar would stop showing any URL suggestions when I’m typing. Regardless of what I type, it just doesn’t show anything. A simple restart fixes it, but clearly this is a bug. Read More
Deploy Dynamic Routing (BGP) between Azure VPN and Third-Party Firewall (Palo Alto)
This blog explains how to deploy dynamic routing (BGP) between Azure VPN and a third-party firewall. You can refer to this topology and deployment guide in scenarios where you need VPN connectivity between an on-premises third-party VPN device and Azure VPN, or any cloud environment.
Why BGP?
BGP is the standard routing protocol commonly used in the Internet to exchange routing and reachability information between two or more networks. When used in the context of Azure Virtual Networks, BGP enables the Azure VPN gateways and your on-premises VPN devices, called BGP peers or neighbors, to exchange “routes” that will inform both gateways on the availability and reachability for those prefixes to go through the gateways or routers involved. BGP can also enable transit routing among multiple networks by propagating routes a BGP gateway learns from one BGP peer to all other BGP peers.
Diagram Pre-Requisite
Firewall Network: Firewall with three interfaces (Public, Private, Management). Here, the LAB has configured with VM-series Palo Alto firewall.
Azure VPN Network: Test VM, Gateway Subnet
Test Network Connected to Firewall Network: Azure VM with UDR pointing to Firewall’s Internal Interface. The test network should be peered with firewall network.
Configuration
Part 1: Configure Azure VPN with BGP enabled
Create Virtual Network Gateway with below specification
Provide Name, Gateway type (VPN), VPN SKU, VNet (with dedicated Gateway Subnet), Public IP
Enable BGP and provide AS number
Create
Note: Azure will auto provision a local BGP peer with an IP address from Gateway Subnet. After deployment the configuration will look similar to below. Make a note of Public IP and Peer IP generated, we need this while configuring VPN at remote end
Create Local Network Gateway
Local Network Gateway represents the firewall VPN network Configuration where you should provide remote configuration parameters.
Provide Name, Remote peer Public IP
In the Address space specify remote BGP peer IP (Router ID in case of Palo Alto).
Please note that if you are configuring static route instead of dynamic you should advertise entire remote network ranges which you want to communicate through VPN. Here BGP making this process much simpler.
In Advanced tab enable BGP and provide remote ASN Number and BGP peer IP
create
Create Connections with default crypto profile
Once the VPN Gateway and Local Network Gateway has provisioned you can build connection which represents IPsec and IKE configurations.
Go to VPN GW and under Settings, Add Connection
Provide Name, VPN Gateway, Local Network Gateway, Pre-Shared Key
Enable BGP
If Required Modify IPsec and IKE Crypto setting, Else leave it as default
Create
Completed the Azure end configuration, now we can move to firewall side.
Part 2: Configure Palo Alto Firewall VPN with BGP enabled
Create IKE Gateway with default IKE Crypto profile
Provide Ike Version, Local VPN Interface, Peer IP, Pre-shared key
Create IPSec Tunnel with default IPsec Crypto profile
Create Tunnel Interface
Create IPsec Tunnel: Provide tunnel Interface, IPsec Crypto profile, IKE Gateway
By this configuration your tunnel should be UP
Now finish the remaining BGP Configurations
Configure a Loopback interface to represent BGP router, we have provided 10.0.17.5 IP for the interface.
Configure virtual router Redistribution Profile
Configure Redistribution Profile as below, this configuration ensures what kind of routers needed to be redistributed to BGP peer routers
Enable BGP and configure local BGP and peer BGP parameters
Provide Router ID, AS number
Make user to enable Install Route Option
Configure EBGP Peer Group and Peer with Local BGP Peer IP, Remote (Azure)BGP Peer IP and Remote (Azure) BGP ASN Number.
Also Specify Redistribution profile, also make sure to enable Allow Redistribute Default Route, if you need to propagate default route to BGP peer router
Create Static route for Azure BGP peer
Commit changes
Test Results
Now we can test the connectivity, I have already configured necessary NAT and default route in Firewall. You can see the propagated route in both azure VPN gateway and Palo Alto firewall.
FW NAT
Name
Src
Zone
Dst
Zone
Dst
I/F
Dst
Addr
Service
Translated Packet Source Translation
Translated Packet Destination Translation
nattovm1
any
Untrust
any
untrust_int_ip
3389
none
destination-translation;address: vm1
nattovm2
any
Untrust
any
untrust_int_ip
3000
none
destination-translation;address: vm2;port: 3389
natto internet
any
Untrust
ethernet1/1
default
0.0.0.0/0
dynamic-ip-and-port;ethernet1/1
none
Stattic Route configured:
Azure VPN GW Connection Status and Propagated routes
Azure Test VM1 (10.0.0.4) Effective routes
Palo Alto BGP Summary
Palo Alto BGP connection status
Palo Alto BGP Received Route
Palo Alto BGP Propagated Route
Final Forwarding table
Ping and trace result from Test VM1 to test VM2
Conclusion:
BGP simplifies the route advertisement process. There are lot more configuration options that we can try in BGP to smooth functioning of routing. BGP also enables automatic redundancy and high Availability. Hence it is always recommended to configure BGP when it comes to production grade complex networking.
This blog explains how to deploy dynamic routing (BGP) between Azure VPN and a third-party firewall. You can refer to this topology and deployment guide in scenarios where you need VPN connectivity between an on-premises third-party VPN device and Azure VPN, or any cloud environment.
Why BGP?
BGP is the standard routing protocol commonly used in the Internet to exchange routing and reachability information between two or more networks. When used in the context of Azure Virtual Networks, BGP enables the Azure VPN gateways and your on-premises VPN devices, called BGP peers or neighbors, to exchange “routes” that will inform both gateways on the availability and reachability for those prefixes to go through the gateways or routers involved. BGP can also enable transit routing among multiple networks by propagating routes a BGP gateway learns from one BGP peer to all other BGP peers.
Diagram Diagram:BGP Between Azure VPN and Third-Party FirewallPre-Requisite
Firewall Network: Firewall with three interfaces (Public, Private, Management). Here, the LAB has configured with VM-series Palo Alto firewall.
Azure VPN Network: Test VM, Gateway Subnet
Test Network Connected to Firewall Network: Azure VM with UDR pointing to Firewall’s Internal Interface. The test network should be peered with firewall network.
Configuration
Part 1: Configure Azure VPN with BGP enabled
Create Virtual Network Gateway with below specification
Provide Name, Gateway type (VPN), VPN SKU, VNet (with dedicated Gateway Subnet), Public IP
Enable BGP and provide AS number
Create
Note: Azure will auto provision a local BGP peer with an IP address from Gateway Subnet. After deployment the configuration will look similar to below. Make a note of Public IP and Peer IP generated, we need this while configuring VPN at remote end
Create Local Network Gateway
Local Network Gateway represents the firewall VPN network Configuration where you should provide remote configuration parameters.
Provide Name, Remote peer Public IP
In the Address space specify remote BGP peer IP (Router ID in case of Palo Alto).
Please note that if you are configuring static route instead of dynamic you should advertise entire remote network ranges which you want to communicate through VPN. Here BGP making this process much simpler.
In Advanced tab enable BGP and provide remote ASN Number and BGP peer IP
create
Create Connections with default crypto profile
Once the VPN Gateway and Local Network Gateway has provisioned you can build connection which represents IPsec and IKE configurations.
Go to VPN GW and under Settings, Add Connection
Provide Name, VPN Gateway, Local Network Gateway, Pre-Shared Key
Enable BGP
If Required Modify IPsec and IKE Crypto setting, Else leave it as default
Create
Completed the Azure end configuration, now we can move to firewall side.
Part 2: Configure Palo Alto Firewall VPN with BGP enabled
Create IKE Gateway with default IKE Crypto profile
Provide Ike Version, Local VPN Interface, Peer IP, Pre-shared key
Create IPSec Tunnel with default IPsec Crypto profile
Create Tunnel Interface
Create IPsec Tunnel: Provide tunnel Interface, IPsec Crypto profile, IKE Gateway
By this configuration your tunnel should be UP
Now finish the remaining BGP Configurations
Configure a Loopback interface to represent BGP router, we have provided 10.0.17.5 IP for the interface.
Configure virtual router Redistribution Profile
Configure Redistribution Profile as below, this configuration ensures what kind of routers needed to be redistributed to BGP peer routers
Enable BGP and configure local BGP and peer BGP parameters
Provide Router ID, AS number
Make user to enable Install Route Option
Configure EBGP Peer Group and Peer with Local BGP Peer IP, Remote (Azure)BGP Peer IP and Remote (Azure) BGP ASN Number.
Also Specify Redistribution profile, also make sure to enable Allow Redistribute Default Route, if you need to propagate default route to BGP peer router
Create Static route for Azure BGP peer
Commit changes
Test Results
Now we can test the connectivity, I have already configured necessary NAT and default route in Firewall. You can see the propagated route in both azure VPN gateway and Palo Alto firewall.
FW NAT
Name
Src Zone
DstZone
DstI/F
DstAddr
Service
Translated Packet Source Translation
Translated Packet Destination Translation
nattovm1
any
Untrust
any
untrust_int_ip
3389
none
destination-translation;address: vm1
nattovm2
any
Untrust
any
untrust_int_ip
3000
none
destination-translation;address: vm2;port: 3389
natto internet
any
Untrust
ethernet1/1
default
0.0.0.0/0
dynamic-ip-and-port;ethernet1/1
none
Stattic Route configured:
Azure VPN GW Connection Status and Propagated routes
Azure Test VM1 (10.0.0.4) Effective routes
Palo Alto BGP Summary
Palo Alto BGP connection status
Palo Alto BGP Received Route
Palo Alto BGP Propagated Route
Final Forwarding table
Ping and trace result from Test VM1 to test VM2
Conclusion:
BGP simplifies the route advertisement process. There are lot more configuration options that we can try in BGP to smooth functioning of routing. BGP also enables automatic redundancy and high Availability. Hence it is always recommended to configure BGP when it comes to production grade complex networking.
Read More
Combine Google Authentication & JWT Tokens using Cookie Authorization
* Edit: project is only a web-api, front-end will be developed in react(next.js)
Hi guys!
I’m a TypeScript Fullstack developer and I’m new to .NET and ASP.NET and basically this is one of my first projects using C# and .NET.
My project’s architecture requires a kind of different than out-of-the-box way of identifying users.
I want Google Authentication which will create a local account (which I can relate other entities to)
And JWT Tokens (access, refresh) generated and sent as cookies to the client and each protected endpoint to be using these cookies to authorize the requesting user.
I haven’t figured out a way of implementing this and still using mostly OOTB tools in order to keep modifications little as possible.
Any tips and tricks on how to implement it?
* Edit2:
Just to be clear, I know how to create endpoints, and protected endpoints using the built in identity framework, using roles, etc… Its this combination of Google Auth, generating tokens, sending them to client as cookies basically is where my difficulty relies.
* I have almost a blank new project, already set up with only google credentials
* Edit: project is only a web-api, front-end will be developed in react(next.js) Hi guys! I’m a TypeScript Fullstack developer and I’m new to .NET and ASP.NET and basically this is one of my first projects using C# and .NET. My project’s architecture requires a kind of different than out-of-the-box way of identifying users.I want Google Authentication which will create a local account (which I can relate other entities to)And JWT Tokens (access, refresh) generated and sent as cookies to the client and each protected endpoint to be using these cookies to authorize the requesting user. I haven’t figured out a way of implementing this and still using mostly OOTB tools in order to keep modifications little as possible. Any tips and tricks on how to implement it? * Edit2: Just to be clear, I know how to create endpoints, and protected endpoints using the built in identity framework, using roles, etc… Its this combination of Google Auth, generating tokens, sending them to client as cookies basically is where my difficulty relies. * I have almost a blank new project, already set up with only google credentials Read More
Lenovo Thinkpad keeps getting stuck in boot error
I have a Lenovo ThinkPad and recently it got stuck in a boot loop. After setting the Secure Boot option to “Enabled” my laptop worked fine, but every time I put it to sleep/hibernate mode it gets into the loop again. This is getting really annoying (because the Secure Boot option, for some reason doesn’t work unless my battery drops to 0% and then I do the whole process again) and inconvenient. Is there a solution to this?
I have a Lenovo ThinkPad and recently it got stuck in a boot loop. After setting the Secure Boot option to “Enabled” my laptop worked fine, but every time I put it to sleep/hibernate mode it gets into the loop again. This is getting really annoying (because the Secure Boot option, for some reason doesn’t work unless my battery drops to 0% and then I do the whole process again) and inconvenient. Is there a solution to this? Read More
Browser updated
Your Browser has been updated has come up on my screen, and asks me to continue, if I do continue and update. (A) What, and if anything will change ? (B) When I switch the computer on, will it be the same as before I updated ?
Your Browser has been updated has come up on my screen, and asks me to continue, if I do continue and update. (A) What, and if anything will change ? (B) When I switch the computer on, will it be the same as before I updated ? Read More
Access the emoji list using the Win + . shortcut
Is there a method, possibly through editing the registry, to set up an emoji shortcut that directly opens the full emoji list rather than displaying the recently used emojis? I primarily utilize emojis and find it cumbersome to access the complete emoji list by clicking on the icon each time. It would be more convenient to have quick access to all emojis, considering that the recently used emojis are already accessible within the full list and through the search feature.
Is there a method, possibly through editing the registry, to set up an emoji shortcut that directly opens the full emoji list rather than displaying the recently used emojis? I primarily utilize emojis and find it cumbersome to access the complete emoji list by clicking on the icon each time. It would be more convenient to have quick access to all emojis, considering that the recently used emojis are already accessible within the full list and through the search feature. Read More
Overwhelmed by the Number of Files?
Greetings everyone,
Following my usage of Windows Defender, I ran a scan that detected a total of 1,127,605 files. This figure seems strangely high to me. Upon inspecting the Windows files for “Old Windows,” I found that it was not present. If this issue is not related to the absence of “Old Windows,” it must be originating from another source.
I would appreciate hearing your thoughts on this matter.
Greetings everyone, Following my usage of Windows Defender, I ran a scan that detected a total of 1,127,605 files. This figure seems strangely high to me. Upon inspecting the Windows files for “Old Windows,” I found that it was not present. If this issue is not related to the absence of “Old Windows,” it must be originating from another source. I would appreciate hearing your thoughts on this matter. Read More