In the coverage report, it lists a condition under decisisions analyzed (example: if A > x) with the 2 possible outcomes true and false, with the totals for each true and false. However it then lists that identical condition a 2nd time with different totals for the outcomes again.
A visual example of the table that shows:
Decisions Analyzed:

What is the difference between the first set of 3 (labeled as 50% covered) and the second set of 230 (labeled as 100% covered)? This issue is present for every condition in my model. It is also what occurs for other coverage types, like MCDC. Here’s an MCDC example:

Again, the top half is the identical text to the bottom half, but the bottom half shows 1 of the 3 rows red (so more coverage is complete) whereas the top half shows all 3 in red (missing more coverage). What is the difference between the halves?
Thank you.
CodyIn the coverage report, it lists a condition under decisisions analyzed (example: if A > x) with the 2 possible outcomes true and false, with the totals for each true and false. However it then lists that identical condition a 2nd time with different totals for the outcomes again.
A visual example of the table that shows:
Decisions Analyzed:

What is the difference between the first set of 3 (labeled as 50% covered) and the second set of 230 (labeled as 100% covered)? This issue is present for every condition in my model. It is also what occurs for other coverage types, like MCDC. Here’s an MCDC example:

Again, the top half is the identical text to the bottom half, but the bottom half shows 1 of the 3 rows red (so more coverage is complete) whereas the top half shows all 3 in red (missing more coverage). What is the difference between the halves?
Thank you.
Cody In the coverage report, it lists a condition under decisisions analyzed (example: if A > x) with the 2 possible outcomes true and false, with the totals for each true and false. However it then lists that identical condition a 2nd time with different totals for the outcomes again.
A visual example of the table that shows:
Decisions Analyzed:

What is the difference between the first set of 3 (labeled as 50% covered) and the second set of 230 (labeled as 100% covered)? This issue is present for every condition in my model. It is also what occurs for other coverage types, like MCDC. Here’s an MCDC example:

Again, the top half is the identical text to the bottom half, but the bottom half shows 1 of the 3 rows red (so more coverage is complete) whereas the top half shows all 3 in red (missing more coverage). What is the difference between the halves?
Thank you.
Cody test coverage, double reported test coverage, mcdc, decision, coverage report MATLAB Answers — New Questions

​