IWR1843BOOST Parameter: “ElevationResolution value: NaN”, which causes the z axis missing in 3D point cloud data.
Device: TI IWR1843BOOST
SDK version: 3.06
Test procedures: 1. Use hardware setup to flash the bin and load the cfg file (generated from mmWave demo visualizer 3.6.0).
2. Run mmWaveRadar() to read the properties on the device.
The value of the mmWaveRadar() output:
val =
BoardName: "TI IWR1843BOOST"
ConfigPort: "COM5"
DataPort: "COM6"
ConfigFile: "C:ProgramDataMATLABSupportPackagesR2023btoolboxtargetsupportpackagestimmwaveradarconfigfilesxwr18xx_BestRangeRateResolution_UpdateRate_10.cfg"
MMWave SDK Version: "03.06.00.00"
SensorIndex: 1
MountingLocation: [0, 0, 0] (m)
MountingAngles: [0, 0, 0] (degrees)
UpdateRate: 10 (samples/s)
RangeResolution: 2.142656e-01 (m)
RangeRateResolution: 3.849848e-02 (m/s)
AzimuthResolution: 1.447751e+01 (degrees)
ElevationResolution: NaN (degrees)
MaximumRange: 1.371300e+01 (m)
MaximumRangeRate: 2.463903e+00 (m/s)
The ElevationResolution is NaN.
However, the 3D point cloud data can be correctly read from Demo visualizer but fails to be read in the MATLAB. Is there any differences from the cfg extract procedure in MATLAB?Device: TI IWR1843BOOST
SDK version: 3.06
Test procedures: 1. Use hardware setup to flash the bin and load the cfg file (generated from mmWave demo visualizer 3.6.0).
2. Run mmWaveRadar() to read the properties on the device.
The value of the mmWaveRadar() output:
val =
BoardName: "TI IWR1843BOOST"
ConfigPort: "COM5"
DataPort: "COM6"
ConfigFile: "C:ProgramDataMATLABSupportPackagesR2023btoolboxtargetsupportpackagestimmwaveradarconfigfilesxwr18xx_BestRangeRateResolution_UpdateRate_10.cfg"
MMWave SDK Version: "03.06.00.00"
SensorIndex: 1
MountingLocation: [0, 0, 0] (m)
MountingAngles: [0, 0, 0] (degrees)
UpdateRate: 10 (samples/s)
RangeResolution: 2.142656e-01 (m)
RangeRateResolution: 3.849848e-02 (m/s)
AzimuthResolution: 1.447751e+01 (degrees)
ElevationResolution: NaN (degrees)
MaximumRange: 1.371300e+01 (m)
MaximumRangeRate: 2.463903e+00 (m/s)
The ElevationResolution is NaN.
However, the 3D point cloud data can be correctly read from Demo visualizer but fails to be read in the MATLAB. Is there any differences from the cfg extract procedure in MATLAB? Device: TI IWR1843BOOST
SDK version: 3.06
Test procedures: 1. Use hardware setup to flash the bin and load the cfg file (generated from mmWave demo visualizer 3.6.0).
2. Run mmWaveRadar() to read the properties on the device.
The value of the mmWaveRadar() output:
val =
BoardName: "TI IWR1843BOOST"
ConfigPort: "COM5"
DataPort: "COM6"
ConfigFile: "C:ProgramDataMATLABSupportPackagesR2023btoolboxtargetsupportpackagestimmwaveradarconfigfilesxwr18xx_BestRangeRateResolution_UpdateRate_10.cfg"
MMWave SDK Version: "03.06.00.00"
SensorIndex: 1
MountingLocation: [0, 0, 0] (m)
MountingAngles: [0, 0, 0] (degrees)
UpdateRate: 10 (samples/s)
RangeResolution: 2.142656e-01 (m)
RangeRateResolution: 3.849848e-02 (m/s)
AzimuthResolution: 1.447751e+01 (degrees)
ElevationResolution: NaN (degrees)
MaximumRange: 1.371300e+01 (m)
MaximumRangeRate: 2.463903e+00 (m/s)
The ElevationResolution is NaN.
However, the 3D point cloud data can be correctly read from Demo visualizer but fails to be read in the MATLAB. Is there any differences from the cfg extract procedure in MATLAB? mmwave radar, iwr1843boost, point cloud MATLAB Answers — New Questions
